This is obviously pejorative and dismissive. Who cares?, only "some slaves"
Read the context. And then you will see that blaming the whole community for the actions of very few is stormfaggotry level of stupidity.
There is no recognition that half a million people sold as slaves is a sizeable crime against humanity. Only callous dismissal.
And who dismissed it?
And of course, the other 90% of the Dutch company was owned by non jews, which in no way validates your relativism.
So, all the Jews are to blame for the action of 10%(if we believe your source, which I don't), meanwhile, none of the whites are to blame for the 90% got it!
The truth is that YES, jews trafficked and profited from selling a LARGE number of people as slaves, and NO 10% of the slave traffic is not something you can minimize and dismiss as "some slaves".
In summary "all Jews are to blame", saying that does it make you feel better?
No matter how much moral relativism and name calling you use.
You are the one doing it. Who is blaming the whole demographic here? Me or you?
You can't quote me "blaming all Jews", because I never did such a thing.
On the other hand, you have a pathological problem recognizing that a horrible crime against humanity was committed against a LARGE number of individuals sold as slaves, and that YES, there were Jews profiteering and participating actively in this trade.
Again, 10% ownership in the Dutch company, half a million people trafficked like cattle, are not small numbers.
Stop minimizing other people's suffering to justify your narrative.
I have heard this before from other groups claiming that "only a few XXXXX were involved in the genocide of only NNNNNN individuals, stop telling the facts or you are blaming all XXXXXs!"
You can't quote me "blaming all Jews", because I never did such a thing.
Just as you can't quote me dismissing slavery. But somehow, you are trying, in all your posts so far, to blame the Jews for the actions of a few.
Again, 10% ownership in the Dutch company, half a million people trafficked like cattle, are not small numbers.
Again, who owned the 90%?
Stop minimizing other people's suffering to justify your narrative.
quote me
I have heard this before from other groups claiming that "only a few XXXXX were involved in the genocide of only NNNNNN individuals, stop telling the facts or you are blaming all XXXXXs!"
I also heard a certain group blaming all the followers of a religion, or a race for the actions of a few. I wonder who those are...
And you care? You only care because only a tiny minority of Jews owned some slaves somewhere in the world(And a discussion only started because a moron thought to blame Jews of owning slaves in America on a thread about woke washing in hollywood), otherwise, you would rejoice on it. And despite that tiny minority owning slaves, it still was a tiny minority and the whole doesn't deserve the blame you are placing
The Dutch company trafficked 53M+ people into slavery. It was 10% Jewish owned.
I get it... 10% (as per your claim, I still want to verify it, but I can't find the book to read it) gets the balls as if they did 90%.
Come on just admit it. Say it, you hate Jews.
I can prove you moved goal posts, and until you provide a copy of the book with those claims or accept that you are putting the blame of 10% of the owners of the company on all Jews you can go and choke on my cock.
Read the context. And then you will see that blaming the whole community for the actions of very few is stormfaggotry level of stupidity.
And who dismissed it?
So, all the Jews are to blame for the action of 10%(if we believe your source, which I don't), meanwhile, none of the whites are to blame for the 90% got it!
In summary "all Jews are to blame", saying that does it make you feel better?
You are the one doing it. Who is blaming the whole demographic here? Me or you?
Cool. Call me when you stop blaming all Jews.
You can't quote me "blaming all Jews", because I never did such a thing.
On the other hand, you have a pathological problem recognizing that a horrible crime against humanity was committed against a LARGE number of individuals sold as slaves, and that YES, there were Jews profiteering and participating actively in this trade.
Again, 10% ownership in the Dutch company, half a million people trafficked like cattle, are not small numbers.
Stop minimizing other people's suffering to justify your narrative.
I have heard this before from other groups claiming that "only a few XXXXX were involved in the genocide of only NNNNNN individuals, stop telling the facts or you are blaming all XXXXXs!"
Just as you can't quote me dismissing slavery. But somehow, you are trying, in all your posts so far, to blame the Jews for the actions of a few.
Again, who owned the 90%?
quote me
I also heard a certain group blaming all the followers of a religion, or a race for the actions of a few. I wonder who those are...
I did already, "some slaves", to refer to half a million people brutalized and sold as property is dismissive and minimizes their suffering.
Here's the facts again:
You can't prove me factually wrong.
I get it... 10% (as per your claim, I still want to verify it, but I can't find the book to read it) gets the balls as if they did 90%.
Come on just admit it. Say it, you hate Jews.
I can prove you moved goal posts, and until you provide a copy of the book with those claims or accept that you are putting the blame of 10% of the owners of the company on all Jews you can go and choke on my cock.