Yes, Mastercard is stopping feminists milking men for money. The famously feminist VP they have that held secret all female CEO meetings in Switzerland (IIRC) is completely irrelevant.
Good joke, cuckold. I'm still boycotting your shitty card.
The whining of the deeply entrenched oppressor class is music to my ears. It's wonderful when their luck runs out.
Read the room. None of your usual lies will save you. "If you let us fall, you'll be next" - How is that fucking different to how your kind operates? Does the phrase "vaccine mandates" mean anything to you?
The banks have realized you're the greatest threat to society and are cutting you off like the terrorist scum you are before you try to cancel them next.
I think many of us do not approve of onlyfans - do you think it is good that a feminist controlled payment processor can decide which websites are allowed to operate?
We're already at that stage. We can't come back from "feminists control who is allowed to succeed." without trials, war crimes convictions and a full ban on that ideology.
You could scatter Mastercard into a million pieces and switch all transactions to fucking Dogecoin and the freaks would find another way to cancel companies.
What they're asking now is for us to save them or else we'll be next. Don't fall for it.
I'm not sure why you are so convinced that feminists are completely supportive of OnlyFans. On the contrary, there are plenty of feminists who want to shut down sex work because it allows them to exploit men better by controlling access to sex - the good old fashioned pussy cartel that existed for hundreds of years, and was extremely effective in making gynocentrism a central pillar of society.
Yeah, because on one hand, it's a one-way siphoning of money from men to women, so they like it, but on the other hand, it's about male sexuality, and male sexuality=rape, so they hate it.
This is why you see things like making it legal to be a prostitute, but illegal to hire a prostitute. Women must be allowed to do whatever they want without consequences and with as many resources extracted from men as possible, but also, men must be punished and prevented from daring to gaze upon women because they're all rapist scum. Viewing it through this lens helps make sense of alimony (aren't women too strong and independent to need support from a man?), and child support and abortion too (abortion: Women get to control when they have children which is a fundamental human right, yet child support: Men do NOT get to control when they have children, and owe women practically endless money under by far the strictest penalties for failure to pay of any kind of debt).
Always lie to the outsiders is their number one rule.
Right. So that's why you are so believing when some feminists say they are pro-sex-work?
Fact is that sex work is revulsive to most women. Throughout most of history, female sexuality was strictly controlled by women (hence the name pussy cartel) to their own benefit. Anyone who looks at things rationally can see why: Women use sex to compete with other women and manipulate men for their individual benefit, so naturally powerful women establish systems to ensure they themselves stay on top of the system.
And who has the most sexual power? It certainly isn't the matriarchs that run society - these women are generally old. So the matriarchs formed the pussy cartel to ensure they couldn't be undercut by the young sexy women.
For someone who claims to know a lot about the "Fourth Reich", you seem to know nothing about how women actually operate.
The two richest women in the world didn't make their money on OnlyFans. They made their money by selling pussy the good old fashioned way. You're dreaming if you think that OnlyFans is a significant means of monetizing sex. The biggest way of monetizing sex is marriage, by several orders of magnitude.
That requires them all to find a mark and keep them for long enough to get their pound of flesh, in a culture where marriage is dying faster than a male Covid patient in a ward staffed by women.
Marriage has the best pay-off, but isn't feasible for most of them. There won't be another Melinda Gates, because everyone knows more about women's nature than before.
This will not be a net benefit to men, it's simply a cat fight between women. Never underestimate women's ability to use sex to their own benefit. There are already plenty of other ways women use sex to make money without actual marriage - child support (oopsie! I'm pregnant), common law marriage etc. Shut one thing down and they'll find another.
This needs to be tackled from the root - stopping men being so obsessed with sex in the first place. One way of doing this is teaching men all the facets of how women exploit sex for their own benefit, not rejoicing when the pussy cartel smacks down another group of women.
I never underestimate the evil of women. That's why I hated OnlyFans. Because I saw it as the culmination of their dehumanization campaign that spanned decades.
The root surely is how terrible women are. You can't blame men for biology.
Men have been dehumanised by women and feminists in far worst ways - divorce rape, the Duluth model, suspected of being perverts for simply hanging out with their children, prevented from seeing their children after divorce, being considered human ATMs. OnlyFans seems trivial in comparison. Your obsession with it is bizarre, to say the least.
Worrying about what women do is what lead us to this problem. Men need to focus on themselves and controlling their own behaviour. "My biology made me do it" sounds more like something a woman would say.
Yes, feminists are in leadership roles at these processors so that's part of it, but another part is chargebacks. They get a lot of those for x-rated content and you know how banks are about chargebacks.
Edit: its been 13hrs since first posting, but just in case, recently remembered Twitter and Facebook's apparent immunity despite having similar (often worse content) so I'd reduce the influence of chargebacks on this, if they even factored in at all.
It was bankers/investors as well. Bankers/investors are tradcons. The other problem is OF couldn't get Brand deals. When you cross the Porn threshold that automatically cuts you off from mainstream brands.
So in the end it may feel good to circlejerk over feminists ruining yet another thing, but I argue it's more like an unholy alliance between feminists and rich GenX/boomers.
My guess is all these diversity-hire activists are starting to show.
Activist leftists don't like porn because men like it and they themselves aren't exactly attractive.
Jealousy, ideology and power are a bad combination.
I have seen both claims made here.
Yes, Mastercard is stopping feminists milking men for money. The famously feminist VP they have that held secret all female CEO meetings in Switzerland (IIRC) is completely irrelevant.
Good joke, cuckold. I'm still boycotting your shitty card.
The whining of the deeply entrenched oppressor class is music to my ears. It's wonderful when their luck runs out.
Read the room. None of your usual lies will save you. "If you let us fall, you'll be next" - How is that fucking different to how your kind operates? Does the phrase "vaccine mandates" mean anything to you?
The banks have realized you're the greatest threat to society and are cutting you off like the terrorist scum you are before you try to cancel them next.
I think many of us do not approve of onlyfans - do you think it is good that a feminist controlled payment processor can decide which websites are allowed to operate?
We're already at that stage. We can't come back from "feminists control who is allowed to succeed." without trials, war crimes convictions and a full ban on that ideology.
You could scatter Mastercard into a million pieces and switch all transactions to fucking Dogecoin and the freaks would find another way to cancel companies.
What they're asking now is for us to save them or else we'll be next. Don't fall for it.
They're a bit late for that. Non-leftists have been on the receiving end of financial censorship for many years.
Yes, they're lying to us. Regardless of what happens to OF, they will still get things we support canceled, with or without Mastercard and co.
I'm conflicted about this, I do not like Mastercard, I do not like OnlyFans and I do not like payment processors pushing their power around.
But honestly I'm guessing is not a moral reason for MasterCard as much as liability since OnlyFans is porn, just more manipulative.
I'm not sure why you are so convinced that feminists are completely supportive of OnlyFans. On the contrary, there are plenty of feminists who want to shut down sex work because it allows them to exploit men better by controlling access to sex - the good old fashioned pussy cartel that existed for hundreds of years, and was extremely effective in making gynocentrism a central pillar of society.
Plenty of feminists consider sex work to be men exploiting women, e.g. those on r/FDS, all those talking about 'sex trafficking' etc.
Whether or not sex work is a good thing is one of the big schisms in feminism. There are fierce opinions on either side. Seriously, know your enemy.
Yeah, because on one hand, it's a one-way siphoning of money from men to women, so they like it, but on the other hand, it's about male sexuality, and male sexuality=rape, so they hate it.
This is why you see things like making it legal to be a prostitute, but illegal to hire a prostitute. Women must be allowed to do whatever they want without consequences and with as many resources extracted from men as possible, but also, men must be punished and prevented from daring to gaze upon women because they're all rapist scum. Viewing it through this lens helps make sense of alimony (aren't women too strong and independent to need support from a man?), and child support and abortion too (abortion: Women get to control when they have children which is a fundamental human right, yet child support: Men do NOT get to control when they have children, and owe women practically endless money under by far the strictest penalties for failure to pay of any kind of debt).
There's no such thing as a schism in feminism.
Don't you know your enemy? Always lie to the outsiders is their number one rule.
Right. So that's why you are so believing when some feminists say they are pro-sex-work?
Fact is that sex work is revulsive to most women. Throughout most of history, female sexuality was strictly controlled by women (hence the name pussy cartel) to their own benefit. Anyone who looks at things rationally can see why: Women use sex to compete with other women and manipulate men for their individual benefit, so naturally powerful women establish systems to ensure they themselves stay on top of the system.
And who has the most sexual power? It certainly isn't the matriarchs that run society - these women are generally old. So the matriarchs formed the pussy cartel to ensure they couldn't be undercut by the young sexy women.
For someone who claims to know a lot about the "Fourth Reich", you seem to know nothing about how women actually operate.
r/FDS was once praised by the Wall Street Journal.
I think I have the archive somewhere.
Because the only way that their dehumanization system turns a profit is if they use things like this to monetize it.
They hate us, they don't want to be near us. OnlyFans let them milk cash from their victims without even knowing names.
The two richest women in the world didn't make their money on OnlyFans. They made their money by selling pussy the good old fashioned way. You're dreaming if you think that OnlyFans is a significant means of monetizing sex. The biggest way of monetizing sex is marriage, by several orders of magnitude.
That requires them all to find a mark and keep them for long enough to get their pound of flesh, in a culture where marriage is dying faster than a male Covid patient in a ward staffed by women.
Marriage has the best pay-off, but isn't feasible for most of them. There won't be another Melinda Gates, because everyone knows more about women's nature than before.
This will not be a net benefit to men, it's simply a cat fight between women. Never underestimate women's ability to use sex to their own benefit. There are already plenty of other ways women use sex to make money without actual marriage - child support (oopsie! I'm pregnant), common law marriage etc. Shut one thing down and they'll find another.
This needs to be tackled from the root - stopping men being so obsessed with sex in the first place. One way of doing this is teaching men all the facets of how women exploit sex for their own benefit, not rejoicing when the pussy cartel smacks down another group of women.
I never underestimate the evil of women. That's why I hated OnlyFans. Because I saw it as the culmination of their dehumanization campaign that spanned decades.
The root surely is how terrible women are. You can't blame men for biology.
Men have been dehumanised by women and feminists in far worst ways - divorce rape, the Duluth model, suspected of being perverts for simply hanging out with their children, prevented from seeing their children after divorce, being considered human ATMs. OnlyFans seems trivial in comparison. Your obsession with it is bizarre, to say the least.
Worrying about what women do is what lead us to this problem. Men need to focus on themselves and controlling their own behaviour. "My biology made me do it" sounds more like something a woman would say.
I was being sarcastic. Mastercard is led by a feminist, they likely fully support OnlyFans.
Oh, and "sex workers" are subhuman scum!
When the Christian Traditionalists and the Woke Feminists have a common goal, shit gets done amazingly effectively.
Yes, feminists are in leadership roles at these processors so that's part of it, but another part is chargebacks. They get a lot of those for x-rated content and you know how banks are about chargebacks.
Edit: its been 13hrs since first posting, but just in case, recently remembered Twitter and Facebook's apparent immunity despite having similar (often worse content) so I'd reduce the influence of chargebacks on this, if they even factored in at all.
It wasn't feminists that did it though.
It was bankers/investors as well. Bankers/investors are tradcons. The other problem is OF couldn't get Brand deals. When you cross the Porn threshold that automatically cuts you off from mainstream brands.
So in the end it may feel good to circlejerk over feminists ruining yet another thing, but I argue it's more like an unholy alliance between feminists and rich GenX/boomers.
Based feminists?