As you may know there have been a variety of background for mass shooters.
A woman shot up google headquarters when youtube demonetized her videos:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/04/nasim-najafi-aghdam-youtube-shooting-demonetisation-payments-father
A trans person shot up their school:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-colorado-shooting/transgender-teen-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-deadly-colorado-school-shooting-idUSKCN24Q00D
And there's so many mass shootings in gangland in chicago you can't even list them all out.
But the press likes to push only the ones that meet their man-hating narrative - when the shooter is a white man - like recently:
https://archive.ph/hSkPM
Apparently this is his reddit post history:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210813174435/https://old.reddit.com/user/Jake3572
**Of the last 24 posts he made - 12 of them were to one of reddits protected man-bashing hate subs - **IncelsInAction.
The sub description of itself:
This sub is for mocking the antics of anyone who identifies themselves as "incel." This is a term popularised on Reddit and 4chan meaning "involuntarily celibate" i.e. men who can't get laid. Some of them get really really mad about it, and here are their stories...
...
Incels who comment in here can expect to be relentlessly mocked by this community. If you don't like it, don't post here.
Did reddit's protection of it's anti-male subs contribute to this shooting?
It seems a lot more plausible than the banned "men going their own way" sub.
I disagree, but it's beside the point. If this is what you believe, then this is the argument that you should have made, not "IT IS LEGAL THEREFORE GOOD", which is the argument that you actually made, and which is quite a bad argument.
I made no comparison. I merely applied the standard that you set.
They are? Should I ask how you know this, or will I think better of it because I know you will answer something like: because women are evil and evil responses must inherently come from them, men are not capable of them.
The truth is rarely very 'nice'.
So being a guy who can't get laid is just a cover for them wanting to... not have women in those communities? Which - you claim - is not very successful because half of the posts are false flags by women?
Will never cease to be amazed at your ability to paint yourself as the victim.
12 years old is legal in some Western countries. Yes, I will call someone a pedophile for that. Also, the 'Western countries' is something that you added in later on, moving the goalposts from your original "BUT IT IS LEGAL IN THE UK!"
Alright, if one cannot verify the identities of those who are posting, how are you so sure that half are women false flagging?
You're confessing to misogyny now?
Never heard of that before for the West, which ones?
I'd be wary of caveats like age difference (e.g. 12 & 14 is vastly different than 12 & 30), or where national consent of age is overrode by state/prefecture laws (e.g. Japan IIRC).
So you have no evidence and just make stuff up. OK.