Kathy Hochul seems like she will be a good governor, maybe even a great one. Her elegance this week comes hard-earned: Appointed Erie County Clerk in 2007 by then-Gov. Eliot Spitzer, later known as Client No. 9, she rose to Congress in 2011 after her male predecessor, Rep. Chris Lee, was caught up in a sex scandal.
You really need to make up your mind about whether you believe unsubstantiated claims of workplace abuse. Not, as you do right now, claim they're false when they're about men and true about women.
It was against another man, but the boys who accused Michael Jackson were lying. That's the first thing that came to mind.
Also, you want to talk about anti-male bias, what about the focus itself? We hear about whenever a high profile man is accused, so if it does turn out to be bullshit, we can point to plenty of women who lie. We often don't hear about it when a man accuses a woman, falsely or in truth. So it's harder to point to lying or truthful men...because we never hear about them accusing anyone in the first place.
One of the big high profile male accusers at the moment would be Johnny Depp...and the only reason we're hearing about his accusations is because it's in response to a lying, abusive woman trying to destroy his life for years, and doing considerable damage to him.
There's your anti-male bias. It's how society at large treats the sexes, it's not about some big female vs male conspiracy. There's plenty to criticize in sex relations without claiming all women are genocidal liars. That's just not true, or productive, when there's actual issues to discuss.
Just like you said that you would admit that you were wrong if that female cop in MN had her name published or was indicted, and when it both happened, you refused to admit that you were wrong.
But your "I blindly believe anything a man says" is your dumbest statement so far, whereby you prove that misogyny is real and that you are its incarnation.
Katie Hill would be a better example anyway. Photo evidence of sexual wrongdoing - at least if you keep the same standards when it comes to power dynamics - and she was in politics, not entertainment. Also, just kind of weird and gross...
I agree, though, it's silly to decry some unsubstantiated claims, while believing others. Such massive bias is no way to reach any sort of truth in matters.
Off topic, but it's pretty weird how, despite politics and entertainment being full of sex pests, a lot of the high profile cases seem to be absolute bullshit. There's plenty of actual creeps out there, but the people who often get nailed to the wall (haha) are usually done so by either extremely flimsy evidence, or evidence that is already debunked. Similar to the cop narrative, too, I suppose; there is real abuse out there, but it's always the absolute bullshit narratives that make the mainstream, where some violent jackass attacks cops and gets killed, or something.
it's pretty weird how, despite politics and entertainment being full of sex pests, a lot of the high profile cases seem to be absolute bullshit.
The same is true for high-profile cases of 'racism'. It's hard to cite even one that did not turn out to be BS. This despite the fact that there are plenty of actual hate crimes to go around. It's just that the media loves to go for the most sensational stories that pander to its prejudices, and these just happen to be, shockingly, totally made up.
Similar to the cop narrative, too, I suppose; there is real abuse out there, but it's always the absolute bullshit narratives that make the mainstream, where some violent jackass attacks cops and gets killed, or something.
My conclusion is: if this is all they got, there really is not a problem with the PO-lees.
That's hard earned??
Yep. It's hard work positioning yourself to take advantage of a bad situation that you might have had a hand in creating/exposing.
You girls should try merit
They never make the cut.
They're so close to realizing, but they can't admit the malice of their people.
Also, women are devoid of workplace abuse? Ellen says hi.
You really need to make up your mind about whether you believe unsubstantiated claims of workplace abuse. Not, as you do right now, claim they're false when they're about men and true about women.
Men aren't known for an ideology that literally advocates to lie for the benefit of the sisterhood.
So you believe unsubstantiated claims coming from men, but not from women?
What a silly fool you are.
"Why would you believe the people who have no record of lying when you don't believe the people who have a record of lying stretching over decades."
Sometimes, you're so crazy that I figure you must be a troll.
Are you telling me that men as a group have "no record of lying", while women do?
Good night, batshit.
Name a man who lied about this kind of thing. Just one.
It was against another man, but the boys who accused Michael Jackson were lying. That's the first thing that came to mind.
Also, you want to talk about anti-male bias, what about the focus itself? We hear about whenever a high profile man is accused, so if it does turn out to be bullshit, we can point to plenty of women who lie. We often don't hear about it when a man accuses a woman, falsely or in truth. So it's harder to point to lying or truthful men...because we never hear about them accusing anyone in the first place.
One of the big high profile male accusers at the moment would be Johnny Depp...and the only reason we're hearing about his accusations is because it's in response to a lying, abusive woman trying to destroy his life for years, and doing considerable damage to him.
There's your anti-male bias. It's how society at large treats the sexes, it's not about some big female vs male conspiracy. There's plenty to criticize in sex relations without claiming all women are genocidal liars. That's just not true, or productive, when there's actual issues to discuss.
Just like you said that you would admit that you were wrong if that female cop in MN had her name published or was indicted, and when it both happened, you refused to admit that you were wrong.
But your "I blindly believe anything a man says" is your dumbest statement so far, whereby you prove that misogyny is real and that you are its incarnation.
Katie Hill would be a better example anyway. Photo evidence of sexual wrongdoing - at least if you keep the same standards when it comes to power dynamics - and she was in politics, not entertainment. Also, just kind of weird and gross...
I agree, though, it's silly to decry some unsubstantiated claims, while believing others. Such massive bias is no way to reach any sort of truth in matters.
Off topic, but it's pretty weird how, despite politics and entertainment being full of sex pests, a lot of the high profile cases seem to be absolute bullshit. There's plenty of actual creeps out there, but the people who often get nailed to the wall (haha) are usually done so by either extremely flimsy evidence, or evidence that is already debunked. Similar to the cop narrative, too, I suppose; there is real abuse out there, but it's always the absolute bullshit narratives that make the mainstream, where some violent jackass attacks cops and gets killed, or something.
The same is true for high-profile cases of 'racism'. It's hard to cite even one that did not turn out to be BS. This despite the fact that there are plenty of actual hate crimes to go around. It's just that the media loves to go for the most sensational stories that pander to its prejudices, and these just happen to be, shockingly, totally made up.
My conclusion is: if this is all they got, there really is not a problem with the PO-lees.