You really need to make up your mind about whether you believe unsubstantiated claims of workplace abuse. Not, as you do right now, claim they're false when they're about men and true about women.
Katie Hill would be a better example anyway. Photo evidence of sexual wrongdoing - at least if you keep the same standards when it comes to power dynamics - and she was in politics, not entertainment. Also, just kind of weird and gross...
I agree, though, it's silly to decry some unsubstantiated claims, while believing others. Such massive bias is no way to reach any sort of truth in matters.
Off topic, but it's pretty weird how, despite politics and entertainment being full of sex pests, a lot of the high profile cases seem to be absolute bullshit. There's plenty of actual creeps out there, but the people who often get nailed to the wall (haha) are usually done so by either extremely flimsy evidence, or evidence that is already debunked. Similar to the cop narrative, too, I suppose; there is real abuse out there, but it's always the absolute bullshit narratives that make the mainstream, where some violent jackass attacks cops and gets killed, or something.
it's pretty weird how, despite politics and entertainment being full of sex pests, a lot of the high profile cases seem to be absolute bullshit.
The same is true for high-profile cases of 'racism'. It's hard to cite even one that did not turn out to be BS. This despite the fact that there are plenty of actual hate crimes to go around. It's just that the media loves to go for the most sensational stories that pander to its prejudices, and these just happen to be, shockingly, totally made up.
Similar to the cop narrative, too, I suppose; there is real abuse out there, but it's always the absolute bullshit narratives that make the mainstream, where some violent jackass attacks cops and gets killed, or something.
My conclusion is: if this is all they got, there really is not a problem with the PO-lees.
They're so close to realizing, but they can't admit the malice of their people.
Also, women are devoid of workplace abuse? Ellen says hi.
You really need to make up your mind about whether you believe unsubstantiated claims of workplace abuse. Not, as you do right now, claim they're false when they're about men and true about women.
Men aren't known for an ideology that literally advocates to lie for the benefit of the sisterhood.
So you believe unsubstantiated claims coming from men, but not from women?
What a silly fool you are.
"Why would you believe the people who have no record of lying when you don't believe the people who have a record of lying stretching over decades."
Katie Hill would be a better example anyway. Photo evidence of sexual wrongdoing - at least if you keep the same standards when it comes to power dynamics - and she was in politics, not entertainment. Also, just kind of weird and gross...
I agree, though, it's silly to decry some unsubstantiated claims, while believing others. Such massive bias is no way to reach any sort of truth in matters.
Off topic, but it's pretty weird how, despite politics and entertainment being full of sex pests, a lot of the high profile cases seem to be absolute bullshit. There's plenty of actual creeps out there, but the people who often get nailed to the wall (haha) are usually done so by either extremely flimsy evidence, or evidence that is already debunked. Similar to the cop narrative, too, I suppose; there is real abuse out there, but it's always the absolute bullshit narratives that make the mainstream, where some violent jackass attacks cops and gets killed, or something.
The same is true for high-profile cases of 'racism'. It's hard to cite even one that did not turn out to be BS. This despite the fact that there are plenty of actual hate crimes to go around. It's just that the media loves to go for the most sensational stories that pander to its prejudices, and these just happen to be, shockingly, totally made up.
My conclusion is: if this is all they got, there really is not a problem with the PO-lees.