I've been struggling to find it. Basically Tim Pool was using the study to hilariously make a Demographics Is Destiny argument to the Left, and it was his intro video to his YouTube page a year or so ago. This, of course, wasn't from Beanie Man himself, but reading a source.

I didn't download the damn thing, and I've been struggling to find the video ever since.

Really, it's not entirely unreasonable since the bulk of Left-wing people are a) young people, b) low status men, c) in favor of abortions, d) promote child-free lifestyles, e) are less heterosexual, f) have crazy views about Malthusian population bombs & climate change, g) single women (married women lean conservative, to the point that marriage and singleness are a huge factor that can predict a woman's political affiliation).

I did recently see a video he made a while back which sourced a study claiming that 100 liberals could expect to have 147 kids, and 100 conservatives could expect to have 208, but that wasn't the specific study. It was those specific numbers that stuck with me.

At the very least, if the study is valid, it should be replicable.

This video really bothers me because no one believes me. I know I saw the damned thing. It's out there.

... Maybe I should make a superchat to Tim's show and ask him to find it?

Here's another interesting article on the concept itself, but damnit if I can't find anything relating "white liberal birth rates" and "white conservative birth rates".

It's the combination of white & ""liberal"" that's the primary issue. Not just white, and not just ""liberal""

There was an old article from The American Conservative which mentioned white fertility rates were a strong corellator to republican/conservative voting patterns, but again, this isn't the thing I noticed.

Damnit, I wish I could find that thing.