This is over a month old, but I couldn't find any posts on it from late June. It was an 8-1 decision and the article doesn't name the cocksucker who dissented.
If this was allowed it seems easy to create an account for the opposing team's star QB and post a bunch of racist content, likely getting him suspended. How can you prove or disprove that a social media account is even your real account?
So would asking the police to start aggressively chasing them up and locking them up for it. They plan this shit with accomplices, even the United Femdom's police catches them out - and then does fuck all.
But you know women would let their BLM purse puppies out to create a riot that would make last year's look like a mere warning if the police dared to attack the true rulers of society.
It just seems that our side is unwilling to play the same game, because they're either too scared of their wrath, or they were always owned by the opposition like Boris "Matriarchy's Puppet" Johnson.
If a student walked up to a teacher and told them to go fuck themselves they would be punished, doing so indirectly should still be punishable. A child lashing out deserves to be spanked not coddled.
Brilliant thinking, ensuring that the 'schools' controlled by radical leftists will soon be punishing students for any sort of speech that does not favor their ideology.
They already do that, or did you already forgot the numerous kids suspended over maga hats. This child ranted against a school and their team, she is entitled to neither, she can always go to a different school with the same Public funding.
This is over a month old, but I couldn't find any posts on it from late June. It was an 8-1 decision and the article doesn't name the cocksucker who dissented.
Edit: It was Clarence Thomas. What the fuck?
If this was allowed it seems easy to create an account for the opposing team's star QB and post a bunch of racist content, likely getting him suspended. How can you prove or disprove that a social media account is even your real account?
Yeah... Clarence Thomas is often not as pro-free speech as we would want.
Based Thomas, knew extending female privilege was a bad thing. She fully deserved her punishment.
Kavanaugh should know better, he's been a target of their sadistic mentality.
You think they should be accepting and rejecting free speech claims based on the gender of the appellant?
It would drastically reduce false rape accusations
So would asking the police to start aggressively chasing them up and locking them up for it. They plan this shit with accomplices, even the United Femdom's police catches them out - and then does fuck all.
But you know women would let their BLM purse puppies out to create a riot that would make last year's look like a mere warning if the police dared to attack the true rulers of society.
That already happens.
It just seems that our side is unwilling to play the same game, because they're either too scared of their wrath, or they were always owned by the opposition like Boris "Matriarchy's Puppet" Johnson.
#metoo every attractive woman you see before they #metoo you
If a student walked up to a teacher and told them to go fuck themselves they would be punished, doing so indirectly should still be punishable. A child lashing out deserves to be spanked not coddled.
Brilliant thinking, ensuring that the 'schools' controlled by radical leftists will soon be punishing students for any sort of speech that does not favor their ideology.
They already do that, or did you already forgot the numerous kids suspended over maga hats. This child ranted against a school and their team, she is entitled to neither, she can always go to a different school with the same Public funding.