This is over a month old, but I couldn't find any posts on it from late June. It was an 8-1 decision and the article doesn't name the cocksucker who dissented.
If this was allowed it seems easy to create an account for the opposing team's star QB and post a bunch of racist content, likely getting him suspended. How can you prove or disprove that a social media account is even your real account?
If a student walked up to a teacher and told them to go fuck themselves they would be punished, doing so indirectly should still be punishable. A child lashing out deserves to be spanked not coddled.
Brilliant thinking, ensuring that the 'schools' controlled by radical leftists will soon be punishing students for any sort of speech that does not favor their ideology.
They already do that, or did you already forgot the numerous kids suspended over maga hats. This child ranted against a school and their team, she is entitled to neither, she can always go to a different school with the same Public funding.
This is over a month old, but I couldn't find any posts on it from late June. It was an 8-1 decision and the article doesn't name the cocksucker who dissented.
Edit: It was Clarence Thomas. What the fuck?
If this was allowed it seems easy to create an account for the opposing team's star QB and post a bunch of racist content, likely getting him suspended. How can you prove or disprove that a social media account is even your real account?
If a student walked up to a teacher and told them to go fuck themselves they would be punished, doing so indirectly should still be punishable. A child lashing out deserves to be spanked not coddled.
Brilliant thinking, ensuring that the 'schools' controlled by radical leftists will soon be punishing students for any sort of speech that does not favor their ideology.
They already do that, or did you already forgot the numerous kids suspended over maga hats. This child ranted against a school and their team, she is entitled to neither, she can always go to a different school with the same Public funding.
Yeah... Clarence Thomas is often not as pro-free speech as we would want.
You think they should be accepting and rejecting free speech claims based on the gender of the appellant?
It would drastically reduce false rape accusations
#metoo every attractive woman you see before they #metoo you