If only we could present a united front against the true enemy. We wouldn't have to hurt anyone, just refuse to do anything for them. Let their world collapse and take their delusions of grandeur with it.
I expected to see the whole abuse accusation being something like "verbal abuse because I gained weight" or some sort of crap they came up with. It does actually seem like this woman went through some shit from this guy going back to a young teen and I'm not totally sure I blame her for offing him. I'm not sure this particular story is egregious enough on it's own for me to claim France is about to fall to female supremacy. Presuming it hasn't already fallen of course.
It does seem like there's a part of the story that's not being told though. It sounds like she had tons of opportunities to go a different direction and chose not to.
Yeah, I think that's what feels off about it. It's one of those stories that feels like it would be a badly written book. There's not enough nuance to it to give it a sense of being real.
She did write a book, so not only did she kill him, but she's also profiting.
Does that sound like the actions of a well-adjusted member of society like women's groups claim her to be, or the actions of a sociopathic sadist with deep hatred and desire to kill?
The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
She wrote a fucking book to profit off it.
People are talking about changing the law because of this - just like the UK did.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.
The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
Imagine that, history does not stop during a two-month tournament that takes place effectively every 2 years (World Cup and Euro).
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
It does not check out with your variant on logic. But in reality, abuse is complicated, and someone who is abused all her life is messed up and not that difficult to control. See Fritzl's poor daughter.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.
You want to lock her up to avoid setting a precedent for less worthy cases, but you would not believe that she acted wrongly, am I getting that right?
Bacot has admitted to shooting Daniel Polette in 2016. She previously referred to him as her stepfather before they married.Polette had started raping her when she was only 12 or 13, according to court documents. At that time he was her mother's boyfriend; he later became Bacot's husband and father of their four children. --- step parents, male or female, are more likely to abuse a kid. You stay married and don't subject your kids to the risk. If true I don't know if I have a problem with this. Grooming and repeated rape. Dude deserves death. Doesn't necessarily make her fit for the public though.
In her bestselling book "Tout Le Monde Savait" ("Everyone Knew"), published in May, Bacot, 40, said Polette, 25 years her senior, first raped her when she was 12 years old, impregnated her at 17 and went on to abuse her over the course of 18 years.
Do you recall the case of the Austrian Fritzl? Even if we assume that your view of the world is correct, the idea that abuse victims (actual ones) who have been abused all their lives will act in a remotely rational way is doubtful. The only reason Fritzl was caught is because he sent someone who was wounded to the hospital instead of letting the kid die.
Yes, this seems like a very hard case. But given the amount of stuff that is alleged, if even a small portion is true, it would justify offing him in my mind. On the other hand, you don't want to give people the right to kill others based on unsubstantiated claims.
How many reasons are we up to now not to marry western women?
If you absolutely feel the need to get married, do what Eddie Murphy joked about: find yourself a bush bitch and keep her the hell out of the states, or any western nation for that matter.
And you're insane if you actually believe this carefully concocted sob story.
The Fourth Reich has wanted and fought for the "right" to murder their partners for literal decades.
A few years ago, they won in the UK.
A few weeks ago, the G7 committed to rebuilding society in a "more feminine way"
A few days ago, Italy announced misogyny laws, hidden in a bill against homophobia.
Now this?
Your position is like the ACLU of the past saying "nah, fuck that, free speech for Nazis?"
You must defend the worst people if you are to win against Fourth Reich tactics. They will lie, they will concoct narratives with their media allies and they will play every sympathy card in the book for a win here.
We must not let another country fall into their hands.
We must fight them in the courts, we must fight them at the ballot boxes, we must never surrender, or our fate will be sealed.
"The male population must be reduced to 10% of current levels and power restored to women"
Again - A few weeks ago, the G7 committed to rebuilding society in a "more feminine way"
Why do you believe her when everything points to it being more obvious fiction than Scientology? She even wrote a book, she's literally profiting off all this. What do we know about book deals - they're always a way to launder money to assets who served a "greater cause" (FBI Director Comey for example)
When did I ever say he was my ally?
I specifically said that we have to defend the worst people to win against the Fourth Reich.
How about you quote something someone actually says for once, instead of making something up and debunking your strawman more retarded than your one-balled Fuehrer?
You know that Hitler didn't care about white people, right? His alliance was based on German superiority, not white superiority, which was a trademark of the American Nazi Party.
Hitler didn't even care about your white race whining, so why on earth do you think anyone else would? Turks and Arabs were part of his Aryan race.
[still repeating proven falsehoods because it’s paid to post here and doesn’t give a shit about reality unless it’s expedient to its ideological paycheck]
Again, yes, you remain funny. That’s why you get replies. Also because you are demonstrably wrong about everything you say. Cry harder about it or just stop posting proven lies.
I'm not wrong. It's not my fault you can't speak German. At no point does he refer to a superior white race. Only an Aryan German race, which is German nationalism.
All stormfags should go out in German flags and sing Doucheland Uber Alles.
I love how you think anyone is going to take your reductio ad absurdum fallacies seriously. I also love how you’re too fucking retarded to even know what a “quote” is. Keep replying. Defend shill accounts. It looks great on you.
You call literally everyone who doesn't call for the immediate murder of all the Joooz a 'paid shill'. Because the only reasonable explanation for not partaking of your retardation is being paid. I wish being sane came with remuneration, but it doesn't.
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA THIS IS WHAT THE PAID SHILL ACTUALLY BELIEVES. IT’S SO FUCKING SOLIPSISTIC THAT IT THINKS THE WORLD EXISTS ONLY TO CATER TO ITS WHIMSHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
For all my disagreements with him, he actually seems like a fairly OK person to have a beer with, while you just appear as a maladjusted, raving psycho who can't shut up about how much he hates da Joooooooooz.
No one gives a shit about you. You just don’t matter at all, except insofar as you’re wrong about everything you say, which makes it fun to expose your paid shilling.
People like you will blame the Jews until Melinda Gates is literally injecting you with estrogen.
lol, dipshit paid shill thinks that his reductio ad absurdum fallacy will be accepted
Basically any woman can kill her husband or boyfriend and then say "he was abusive". Stay safe brothers, stay safe...
If only we could present a united front against the true enemy. We wouldn't have to hurt anyone, just refuse to do anything for them. Let their world collapse and take their delusions of grandeur with it.
He was her step-father and she was impregnated by him at 17. You figure out the rest.
17 is legal in France.
And stoning women to death in Iran is legal.
And murdering your partner is legal if you're female in the UK. Your point is?
I expected to see the whole abuse accusation being something like "verbal abuse because I gained weight" or some sort of crap they came up with. It does actually seem like this woman went through some shit from this guy going back to a young teen and I'm not totally sure I blame her for offing him. I'm not sure this particular story is egregious enough on it's own for me to claim France is about to fall to female supremacy. Presuming it hasn't already fallen of course.
It does seem like there's a part of the story that's not being told though. It sounds like she had tons of opportunities to go a different direction and chose not to.
I would caution you on believing a single word she says. I personally don't believe any of it.
They always do have opportunities to leave, but they always prefer the brutal sadistic murder. Funny that.
Yeah, I think that's what feels off about it. It's one of those stories that feels like it would be a badly written book. There's not enough nuance to it to give it a sense of being real.
She did write a book, so not only did she kill him, but she's also profiting.
Does that sound like the actions of a well-adjusted member of society like women's groups claim her to be, or the actions of a sociopathic sadist with deep hatred and desire to kill?
What if you did believe that she was raped and abused for basically her whole life? Would you then say anything different from what you say now/
I don't believe it. I'm not sure what you mean here. I definitely don't believe her and there's no universe that exists where I would.
I know that you don't believe it, or say that you don't.
The question is: would you say anything differently if you did? I sense that you don't want to answer this question. Why is that?
No, I genuinely don't.
The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
She wrote a fucking book to profit off it.
People are talking about changing the law because of this - just like the UK did.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.
Imagine that, history does not stop during a two-month tournament that takes place effectively every 2 years (World Cup and Euro).
It does not check out with your variant on logic. But in reality, abuse is complicated, and someone who is abused all her life is messed up and not that difficult to control. See Fritzl's poor daughter.
You want to lock her up to avoid setting a precedent for less worthy cases, but you would not believe that she acted wrongly, am I getting that right?
It's a little suspicious that they always bring some weird plan forward around now. They know nobody's looking.
But she was put together enough to get a gun in France (how the fuck?) and kill him with it.
That's correct. But again, I do not believe her even one bit.
During the football tournament. Again.
I swear they pulled this exact trick in the UK during the last one.
Bacot has admitted to shooting Daniel Polette in 2016. She previously referred to him as her stepfather before they married.Polette had started raping her when she was only 12 or 13, according to court documents. At that time he was her mother's boyfriend; he later became Bacot's husband and father of their four children. --- step parents, male or female, are more likely to abuse a kid. You stay married and don't subject your kids to the risk. If true I don't know if I have a problem with this. Grooming and repeated rape. Dude deserves death. Doesn't necessarily make her fit for the public though.
If true, she was absolutely right in killing him.
It's a pretty big if, considering she married him.
"I know you molested me, but I will marry you instead of running to the eleven billion women's shelters that exist, paid for by men for some reason."
Grooming, trauma bond, Stockholm syndrome. You're thinking like a rational person, not someone who's been subjected to years of abuse.
Do you recall the case of the Austrian Fritzl? Even if we assume that your view of the world is correct, the idea that abuse victims (actual ones) who have been abused all their lives will act in a remotely rational way is doubtful. The only reason Fritzl was caught is because he sent someone who was wounded to the hospital instead of letting the kid die.
Yes, this seems like a very hard case. But given the amount of stuff that is alleged, if even a small portion is true, it would justify offing him in my mind. On the other hand, you don't want to give people the right to kill others based on unsubstantiated claims.
How many reasons are we up to now not to marry western women?
If you absolutely feel the need to get married, do what Eddie Murphy joked about: find yourself a bush bitch and keep her the hell out of the states, or any western nation for that matter.
You are insane. A convicted child rapist was shot by his child bride, and you and the prosecutor think that the victim should be punished for this.
And you're insane if you actually believe this carefully concocted sob story.
The Fourth Reich has wanted and fought for the "right" to murder their partners for literal decades.
A few years ago, they won in the UK.
A few weeks ago, the G7 committed to rebuilding society in a "more feminine way"
A few days ago, Italy announced misogyny laws, hidden in a bill against homophobia.
Now this?
Your position is like the ACLU of the past saying "nah, fuck that, free speech for Nazis?"
You must defend the worst people if you are to win against Fourth Reich tactics. They will lie, they will concoct narratives with their media allies and they will play every sympathy card in the book for a win here.
We must not let another country fall into their hands.
We must fight them in the courts, we must fight them at the ballot boxes, we must never surrender, or our fate will be sealed.
"The male population must be reduced to 10% of current levels and power restored to women"
Again: convicted child rapist.
She is not the man behind the curtain who orchestrated her step-father's arrest and conviction for raping another girl.
Stop acting like every piece of shit with a Y chromosome is your ally.
Again - A few weeks ago, the G7 committed to rebuilding society in a "more feminine way"
Why do you believe her when everything points to it being more obvious fiction than Scientology? She even wrote a book, she's literally profiting off all this. What do we know about book deals - they're always a way to launder money to assets who served a "greater cause" (FBI Director Comey for example)
When did I ever say he was my ally?
I specifically said that we have to defend the worst people to win against the Fourth Reich.
How much is the NOW paying you and the other stormcucks to project this hard?
We will not surrender to the Fourth Reich. We will not live under the boot of sadistic oppressors like your masters.
You can’t get payed to shill for the alt right, no one is offering Tallest cash, he’s well meaning but overly aggressive.
Thanks Tallest alt.
Paid shills, ladies and gents! This is the caliber of desk jockey they send here.
How about you quote something someone actually says for once, instead of making something up and debunking your strawman more retarded than your one-balled Fuehrer?
Can we just ban him already? Has he ever been upvoted here?
The unmitigated irony from the inhuman communist. How pathetic.
Wow, that's a new one.
You know that Hitler didn't care about white people, right? His alliance was based on German superiority, not white superiority, which was a trademark of the American Nazi Party.
Hitler didn't even care about your white race whining, so why on earth do you think anyone else would? Turks and Arabs were part of his Aryan race.
Again, yes, you remain funny. That’s why you get replies. Also because you are demonstrably wrong about everything you say. Cry harder about it or just stop posting proven lies.
I'm not wrong. It's not my fault you can't speak German. At no point does he refer to a superior white race. Only an Aryan German race, which is German nationalism.
All stormfags should go out in German flags and sing Doucheland Uber Alles.
Only when called out did you finally manage to do that, and that probably only once.
I'm a communist now? What's your proof?
I love how you think anyone is going to take your reductio ad absurdum fallacies seriously. I also love how you’re too fucking retarded to even know what a “quote” is. Keep replying. Defend shill accounts. It looks great on you.
You call literally everyone who doesn't call for the immediate murder of all the Joooz a 'paid shill'. Because the only reasonable explanation for not partaking of your retardation is being paid. I wish being sane came with remuneration, but it doesn't.
I'm a paid shill? I've been part of this community longer than you, who came here following me like I stepped in shit and brought it here.
People like you will blame the Jews until Melinda Gates is literally injecting you with estrogen.
Wait, is he actually here because he's following you?
Pretty sure. I made him mad on TD or general and he started showing up here.
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA THIS IS WHAT THE PAID SHILL ACTUALLY BELIEVES. IT’S SO FUCKING SOLIPSISTIC THAT IT THINKS THE WORLD EXISTS ONLY TO CATER TO ITS WHIMSHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
For all my disagreements with him, he actually seems like a fairly OK person to have a beer with, while you just appear as a maladjusted, raving psycho who can't shut up about how much he hates da Joooooooooz.
Literally no one gives a single flying fuck.
No one gives a shit about you. You just don’t matter at all, except insofar as you’re wrong about everything you say, which makes it fun to expose your paid shilling.
lol, dipshit paid shill thinks that his reductio ad absurdum fallacy will be accepted
Go back to sucking feminist strap on, I'm really tired of your routine.
Stop lying and you’ll stop being replied to.
I'm lying? Really?
According to your tinfoil bullshit, the Jews want a world full of Islamists who want to kill them.
Do I even need to argue with you and your carefully selected copy pasta quotes?