The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
She wrote a fucking book to profit off it.
People are talking about changing the law because of this - just like the UK did.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.
The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
Imagine that, history does not stop during a two-month tournament that takes place effectively every 2 years (World Cup and Euro).
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
It does not check out with your variant on logic. But in reality, abuse is complicated, and someone who is abused all her life is messed up and not that difficult to control. See Fritzl's poor daughter.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.
You want to lock her up to avoid setting a precedent for less worthy cases, but you would not believe that she acted wrongly, am I getting that right?
It's a little suspicious that they always bring some weird plan forward around now. They know nobody's looking.
I don't believe that. If you look at other months, I'm sure you'd find something as well. It's not as if their agenda is paused for the other average 11 months.
But she was put together enough to get a gun in France (how the fuck?) and kill him with it.
That is a good question. It's easier to get a gun in Europe than you guys think. But if she good not get to the police for fear of her alleged abuser, how was she able to get a gun?
Problem is that I don't trust the system anymore. It is a terrible thing for government power to puts its paws on a scale to benefit one group over another, not because of the cases that it effects, but because it destroys all social trust and capital.
That's correct. But again, I do not believe her even one bit.
That's a reasonable position. It's hard to evaluate whether it is true or not. I do hope the prosecution acted with integrity, rather than submitting to public pressure - which in the French system, is actually more likely (actually independently from public pressure, which may be acting with integrity or not depending on the case and the ideas).
No, I genuinely don't.
The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
She wrote a fucking book to profit off it.
People are talking about changing the law because of this - just like the UK did.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.
Imagine that, history does not stop during a two-month tournament that takes place effectively every 2 years (World Cup and Euro).
It does not check out with your variant on logic. But in reality, abuse is complicated, and someone who is abused all her life is messed up and not that difficult to control. See Fritzl's poor daughter.
You want to lock her up to avoid setting a precedent for less worthy cases, but you would not believe that she acted wrongly, am I getting that right?
It's a little suspicious that they always bring some weird plan forward around now. They know nobody's looking.
But she was put together enough to get a gun in France (how the fuck?) and kill him with it.
That's correct. But again, I do not believe her even one bit.
I don't believe that. If you look at other months, I'm sure you'd find something as well. It's not as if their agenda is paused for the other average 11 months.
That is a good question. It's easier to get a gun in Europe than you guys think. But if she good not get to the police for fear of her alleged abuser, how was she able to get a gun?
Problem is that I don't trust the system anymore. It is a terrible thing for government power to puts its paws on a scale to benefit one group over another, not because of the cases that it effects, but because it destroys all social trust and capital.
That's a reasonable position. It's hard to evaluate whether it is true or not. I do hope the prosecution acted with integrity, rather than submitting to public pressure - which in the French system, is actually more likely (actually independently from public pressure, which may be acting with integrity or not depending on the case and the ideas).