Yeah, I think that's what feels off about it. It's one of those stories that feels like it would be a badly written book. There's not enough nuance to it to give it a sense of being real.
She did write a book, so not only did she kill him, but she's also profiting.
Does that sound like the actions of a well-adjusted member of society like women's groups claim her to be, or the actions of a sociopathic sadist with deep hatred and desire to kill?
The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
She wrote a fucking book to profit off it.
People are talking about changing the law because of this - just like the UK did.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.
I would caution you on believing a single word she says. I personally don't believe any of it.
They always do have opportunities to leave, but they always prefer the brutal sadistic murder. Funny that.
Yeah, I think that's what feels off about it. It's one of those stories that feels like it would be a badly written book. There's not enough nuance to it to give it a sense of being real.
She did write a book, so not only did she kill him, but she's also profiting.
Does that sound like the actions of a well-adjusted member of society like women's groups claim her to be, or the actions of a sociopathic sadist with deep hatred and desire to kill?
What if you did believe that she was raped and abused for basically her whole life? Would you then say anything different from what you say now/
I don't believe it. I'm not sure what you mean here. I definitely don't believe her and there's no universe that exists where I would.
I know that you don't believe it, or say that you don't.
The question is: would you say anything differently if you did? I sense that you don't want to answer this question. Why is that?
No, I genuinely don't.
The timing is suspicious - yet again during the football? This trick got pulled before.
The story doesn't check out with any logic.
She wrote a fucking book to profit off it.
People are talking about changing the law because of this - just like the UK did.
If she was telling the truth I'd still want her locked up, because using the worst example of a person as a justification for an exploitable precedent is typical feminism.