It brings down the chances of older people dying from 10% to close to 0%. What supposed damage to younger people outweighs that? Or are the mostly woke 'younger people' worth more than older people who have actually contributed to society?
You're not wrong, and it's criminal that they have been censoring any and all talk about Ivermectin. That said, compared to nothing I'd still say that the vaccine is quite a god bargain for those who are older. Even perhaps compared to Ivermectin.
It brings down the chances of older people dying from 10% to close to 0%. What supposed damage to younger people outweighs that? Or are the mostly woke 'younger people' worth more than older people who have actually contributed to society?
So does Ivermectin, apparently, and it has a half century of data to evaluate its risks and costs (effectively) nothing to administer.
You're not wrong, and it's criminal that they have been censoring any and all talk about Ivermectin. That said, compared to nothing I'd still say that the vaccine is quite a god bargain for those who are older. Even perhaps compared to Ivermectin.
Do a few cases really outweigh the benefit that it does for older people?