You're the one that needs to defend the status quo of legal over-reach, not the other way around.
Not particularly. When you propose that police officers start disregarding some of the laws, the least you can do is specify by what standard they should do that. Or do you expect to be on call 24/7 for them to ask you if they should enforce this or that law?
Oh, and before you bring up "but that's the Feds" for literally any of it,
Don't you worry, I'm European.
Police corruption absolutely exists
No doubt it does, but it is not 'corruption' to enforce laws that you do not like.
And I didn't deny that there are. I just pointed out that you need some standard, as opposed to just repeating 'UNJUST' as an incantation. By what standard are they to determine what laws are 'unjust'?
Because let's be real, all I said is that cops enforce unjust laws, including an example that is pretty undeniable
If you're getting mad that cops enforce the law, which you call unjust, then the least you can do is specify a standard for laws that they should not enforce. Otherwise it's just "laws that Ricwulf doesn't like".
you're so eager to oppose The Other Side™ that you're actually willing to defend the status quo regarding unjust laws.
Blah blah blah, what I opposed was your anarchistic ideas.
Oh, and you being European is irrelevant
The point is that I'm not going to say that "it's just the feds", but apparently you missed that.
Figures, because you addressed absolutely nothing. You just repeat whining about 'enforcement of unjust laws' without setting any sort of standards for laws that they should ignore. And that's because you can't.
I agree that morality is not relative, but by what standard should that be determined?
Not particularly. When you propose that police officers start disregarding some of the laws, the least you can do is specify by what standard they should do that. Or do you expect to be on call 24/7 for them to ask you if they should enforce this or that law?
Don't you worry, I'm European.
No doubt it does, but it is not 'corruption' to enforce laws that you do not like.
And I didn't deny that there are. I just pointed out that you need some standard, as opposed to just repeating 'UNJUST' as an incantation. By what standard are they to determine what laws are 'unjust'?
If you're getting mad that cops enforce the law, which you call unjust, then the least you can do is specify a standard for laws that they should not enforce. Otherwise it's just "laws that Ricwulf doesn't like".
Blah blah blah, what I opposed was your anarchistic ideas.
The point is that I'm not going to say that "it's just the feds", but apparently you missed that.
Figures, because you addressed absolutely nothing. You just repeat whining about 'enforcement of unjust laws' without setting any sort of standards for laws that they should ignore. And that's because you can't.