Cons BTFO!!!
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Not particularly. When you propose that police officers start disregarding some of the laws, the least you can do is specify by what standard they should do that. Or do you expect to be on call 24/7 for them to ask you if they should enforce this or that law?
Don't you worry, I'm European.
No doubt it does, but it is not 'corruption' to enforce laws that you do not like.
And I didn't deny that there are. I just pointed out that you need some standard, as opposed to just repeating 'UNJUST' as an incantation. By what standard are they to determine what laws are 'unjust'?
If you're getting mad that cops enforce the law, which you call unjust, then the least you can do is specify a standard for laws that they should not enforce. Otherwise it's just "laws that Ricwulf doesn't like".
Blah blah blah, what I opposed was your anarchistic ideas.
The point is that I'm not going to say that "it's just the feds", but apparently you missed that.
Figures, because you addressed absolutely nothing. You just repeat whining about 'enforcement of unjust laws' without setting any sort of standards for laws that they should ignore. And that's because you can't.
Whether you want it or not, what you are advocating for is anarchy.
It's always a sign when someone does not have the ability or the courage to defend his claims, and tries to put the burden of proof on you for disproving him. Doesn't work like that. But it's easy to see why you are unable to provide any standard, because you realize any standard would be completely absurd.
Like you said when you misinterpreted my Europe comment, you made the claim, so I'm going to hold you to it all the same.
Also, this has nothing to do with being a laywer.
I recommend that you remove what comes after. It's glowie stuff of the highest caliber and is sure to be removed from this place.
Are you identifying a problem? It doesn't seem like it. You're unable to provide any standard, so so far it's nothing beyond "laws that you don't like".
I don't respond to ultimata.
Considering that you did not even define one of the terms in your claim, namely "unjust", that seems a distinct possibility. I don't think there is any way in which you can define it without leading to anarchy.
No, it's that I realize how dangerous it is to give arbitrary powers to random officials to enforce and ignore laws based on whether they like them or not.