Trump calls out Liz Cheney, Mike Pence and Mitch McConnell
(www.donaldjtrump.com)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Pence was a horrible pick. Mitch deserves the ditch. Don't know anything about ole Liz.
A war against all isn't one you're going to win.
Liz Cheney is likely going to be removed from her Party leadership role soon and she will be likely primaried out of her House seat by Anthony Bouchard in 2022.
Mike Pence is a has been with no charisma and no national following of his own. He will never win a Presidential primary.
McConnell is likely to retire from the Senate and it looks like he will push John Thune as his successor.
Those who want an America first agenda need to primary Thune so Mitch doesn't easily get his successor in.
This is not a unwinnable battle against all.
You don't want him as an enemy.
You sure as hell don't want him as an enemy.
Which you won't win, and even if you did, he'd just get another one amenable to him.
It most certainly is. If he were going about it strategically, he'd focus on Liz Cheney, instead of picking battles and making enemies he doesn't need to make.
Mitch was the enemy of America first throughout Trump's whole Presidency.
He forced Trump to pick from a list of shit options in terms of cabinet picks.
The three worthless Supreme Court justices that Trump appointed came from a list that Mitch and the Federalist Society gave to Trump.
Mitch threw the Georgia Senate races by not going for $2000 stimulus checks.
Mitch is arguably the biggest cancer for America first.
Anyone who believes in America first cannot compromise with the corrupt turtle.
Pence is irrelevant in national politics. Who likes that bland silver haired traitor? The only thing positive I can say about him is that he knows enough to not be alone in a room with a woman.
Trump is not picking a fight with every single corrupt fucker in Congress. That would be an unwinnable battle.
This is a focused and necessary battle that must be fought.
Is there anyone who isn't a 'traitor' in your opinion? Like I told you at the time, he did not have the authority to do what you demanded.
Effectively, by taking on the latter to simultaneously, he's taking on more than he can handle.
Pence had the authority to send it back to the legislatures.
Constitutional law experts on Trump's legal team have stated that he did. You just don't want to accept it. I don't call everyone traitors. I have described very few as traitors. However I have said many in politics are controlled opposition. Don't equate the two.
Trump taking on three very unpopular Republicans is not insurmountable.
Don't waste your time. The guy you're responding to is basically one of those Reddit-tier Leftist-in--disguise-as-an-Anti-Leftist.
He makes excuses for the current uniparty zeitgeist and is constantly justifying why the people who are supposed to be anti-Leftist should cede their views, principles, and morals to the Left.
I tried blocking him to avoid having my heart pressure raised reading his Liberal nonsense but it doesn't appear to work.
I absolutely HATE people like him who refuse to look at the facts, refuse to acknowledge the facts, and then deep-dive into non-sequitur snark to avoid addressing the truth.
Any idiot still denying any election fraud has taken place (it has, and even with Google/YouTube scrubbing a lot of the video evidence there is still some available, including the live hacking demonstration during the Georgia Senate hearing), and any idiot still making excuses for the media's misrepresentation of events and the Centrists/Moderates who justify or accept the disinformation is an enemy of the people, an enemy of freedom, and an enemy of truth.
The only consolation I get from seeing that Reddit-tier excuse-maker's comments is how downvoted he is spewing his Reddit-tier bullcrap. I came here to get away from people like that, since they flood every single corner of the internet with their falsehoods and truth-denial.
If that's the case, the VP of every losing presidential candidate would have done that.
May I expound on just how little faith I have in so called 'experts'?
What's the difference?
The latter two have a great amount of institutional power, and they can use it against Trump, or they can stand aside. This assures that they're going to use it against them. So it's very stupid.
Strictly speaking, Lee Harvey Oswald acted within the bounds of his oath of enlistment.
Yes Tony, we need to make compromises with the scorpions to make it across the river. After all, they surely would never sting us.
Not attacking people when the attack will do you no good and only inflames the other party against you is not a 'compromise', it's called common sense.
Hey, that's the strategy "conservatives" have been using for twice as long as I've been alive, if not longer. How's that been working out?
Keep advocating for losing m8
They've been not picking fights from which they have nothing to gain and only to lose?
Next you'll be telling me that they've also pursued "not eating your own shit", and that this clearly demonstrates that this is a very bad idea.
No, it's the getting along to get along shit. Oh no, don't point out the traitors in your own party. They share the same letter after their name as you! You have to support and continue to elect these people who do nothing for you! Don't point out how and where they fuck you over, that's uncouth! Just keep electing these traitors!
You ever heard of the saying "if you're going to shoot at the king, you better not miss"?
This is just infantile complaining on the part of Trump, as he's not getting rid of McConnell and Pence by saying this. Instead, he's making sure that they're aware that he hasn't gotten over his bitterness, and ensuring that they'll probably do everything to sabotage him going forward.
Are you capable of nuance?
Oh no! They'll do the thing they were going to do anyways! What a disaster!
Hey Tony, maybe we've been too hard on game studios who censor their own work. After all, they're just doing it to ensure games journalists don't sabotage their release with bad reviews! Surely that's been a winning strategy for them huh?
Bruh who gives a shit about Trump as a politician anymore anyways? He is never going to get re-elected. He might try because he's a retard, but the best thing he can do right now is constantly shit on uniparty republicans. Never let that leave public consciousness, encourage others to primary traitors.
Oh but he's using mean words towards people who hate him anyways wah wah wah
Edit: If Trump could set aside his ego, this would be the ideal situation for DeSantis. Let Trump be the mouthy attack dog going after literally anyone and anything while DeSantis keeps his hands mostly clean in a presidential run. However I don't believe Trump will abstain from the primaries in 3 years
I think Trump will win it.
It's whether he can get people in to replace them that aren't just as bad or worse.
Can't believe I believed Pence would save us. You'd think the guy who doesn't trust women enough to be near them wouldn't allow them to have power.
I love that you think the Pence Rule is about 'not trusting wahmen'.
Now you are just being contrarian for no reason.
What other way would someone interpet the Pence rule?
It is the one thing I really like about Pence.
I also like that about Pence. And I think his rule is a very good idea. Which is why I know that the conclusion that this means that one thinks every single wahmen is untrustworthy is stupid.
There's not many other ways to read it.
No, that's just you. All that means is that he doesn't trust rando women (or men, if they would make similar accusations) to not try to destroy his career, and that is quite wise. And very different from your "every single woman is evil".