Trump calls out Liz Cheney, Mike Pence and Mitch McConnell
(www.donaldjtrump.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
You don't want him as an enemy.
You sure as hell don't want him as an enemy.
Which you won't win, and even if you did, he'd just get another one amenable to him.
It most certainly is. If he were going about it strategically, he'd focus on Liz Cheney, instead of picking battles and making enemies he doesn't need to make.
Mitch was the enemy of America first throughout Trump's whole Presidency.
He forced Trump to pick from a list of shit options in terms of cabinet picks.
The three worthless Supreme Court justices that Trump appointed came from a list that Mitch and the Federalist Society gave to Trump.
Mitch threw the Georgia Senate races by not going for $2000 stimulus checks.
Mitch is arguably the biggest cancer for America first.
Anyone who believes in America first cannot compromise with the corrupt turtle.
Pence is irrelevant in national politics. Who likes that bland silver haired traitor? The only thing positive I can say about him is that he knows enough to not be alone in a room with a woman.
Trump is not picking a fight with every single corrupt fucker in Congress. That would be an unwinnable battle.
This is a focused and necessary battle that must be fought.
Is there anyone who isn't a 'traitor' in your opinion? Like I told you at the time, he did not have the authority to do what you demanded.
Effectively, by taking on the latter to simultaneously, he's taking on more than he can handle.
Pence had the authority to send it back to the legislatures.
Constitutional law experts on Trump's legal team have stated that he did. You just don't want to accept it. I don't call everyone traitors. I have described very few as traitors. However I have said many in politics are controlled opposition. Don't equate the two.
Trump taking on three very unpopular Republicans is not insurmountable.
Don't waste your time. The guy you're responding to is basically one of those Reddit-tier Leftist-in--disguise-as-an-Anti-Leftist.
He makes excuses for the current uniparty zeitgeist and is constantly justifying why the people who are supposed to be anti-Leftist should cede their views, principles, and morals to the Left.
I tried blocking him to avoid having my heart pressure raised reading his Liberal nonsense but it doesn't appear to work.
I absolutely HATE people like him who refuse to look at the facts, refuse to acknowledge the facts, and then deep-dive into non-sequitur snark to avoid addressing the truth.
Any idiot still denying any election fraud has taken place (it has, and even with Google/YouTube scrubbing a lot of the video evidence there is still some available, including the live hacking demonstration during the Georgia Senate hearing), and any idiot still making excuses for the media's misrepresentation of events and the Centrists/Moderates who justify or accept the disinformation is an enemy of the people, an enemy of freedom, and an enemy of truth.
The only consolation I get from seeing that Reddit-tier excuse-maker's comments is how downvoted he is spewing his Reddit-tier bullcrap. I came here to get away from people like that, since they flood every single corner of the internet with their falsehoods and truth-denial.
If that's the case, the VP of every losing presidential candidate would have done that.
May I expound on just how little faith I have in so called 'experts'?
What's the difference?
The latter two have a great amount of institutional power, and they can use it against Trump, or they can stand aside. This assures that they're going to use it against them. So it's very stupid.
Strictly speaking, Lee Harvey Oswald acted within the bounds of his oath of enlistment.