Hate to break the news to her, but "White America" understands the need for a proper trial and a jury of unintimidated peers. What we don't seem to get is the desire to pass summary judgement on a dude before he has his day in court, and then celebrate the miscarriage of justice that occurs during his trial, to the extent of cities declaring states of emergency even when the verdict falls in the favor of the extremist group's wishes, because they know that certain demographics are going to once again see it as a reason to burn, loot, and generally act like a group of imbeciles.
Women are emotional thinkers. Justice in their mind is whatever produces pleasant emotion-drugs in their brains. Where it gets dangerous and damaging is that it is also tied in with their basic, evolved-in female instincts. These instincts and their propensity towards emotional reasoning are why WOMEN SHOULD NEVER HOLD POSITIONS OF POWER IN SOCIETY. They simply do not have the capacity to be impartial and fair, consistently across the populace.
I mean, everyone has known this throughout recorded history. It is only in the last 100 years we experimented with women controlling societies. It is utter, abject failure on every measureable outcome.
Ehhhh. Maybe it's because of women, but I think the bigger culprit is the extension of suffrage to every adult with or without a pulse. People by and large don't make good, politically informed voters.
I'll speak to the "air conditioning is sexist" line, but from the other end of the spectrum. The AC in my section of the building where I work is controlled by the women. One day in the middle of winter I was literally freezing my nips off, and there was cool air blowing from the ceiling vents. I go and check the thermostat, and it's set for the lowest setting. I did a quick whip-around the department and lo and behold all of these women have blankets over their laps and/or space heaters under their desks. Because so many of these women were post-wall and pre-menopausal, they had the heat turned all the way down so they could deal with their hot flashes, but then they bundled up because they were otherwise too cold. And heaven help me if I had tried to say anything about it to any of them. I just took to slowly nudging the thing back up every night before I went home since I was usually the last one out the door.
You would think, but menopause does weird shit to women's body chemistry and apparently there were enough of them in the department dealing with hot flashes that the rest of them were okay with just running their heaters + blankets in dealing with the chill. That whole section of the building was the bane of our existence in IT, because their stupid heaters would either overload the circuit in their wing and pop the breakers, or they'd constantly have issues with the towers under their desks overheating because they'd aim their personal heater damn near right at it.
Hate to break the news to her, but "White America" understands the need for a proper trial and a jury of unintimidated peers. What we don't seem to get is the desire to pass summary judgement on a dude before he has his day in court, and then celebrate the miscarriage of justice that occurs during his trial, to the extent of cities declaring states of emergency even when the verdict falls in the favor of the extremist group's wishes, because they know that certain demographics are going to once again see it as a reason to burn, loot, and generally act like a group of imbeciles.
Every single time there's some divisive shit, it's a feminist woman behind it.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Removed
Women are emotional thinkers. Justice in their mind is whatever produces pleasant emotion-drugs in their brains. Where it gets dangerous and damaging is that it is also tied in with their basic, evolved-in female instincts. These instincts and their propensity towards emotional reasoning are why WOMEN SHOULD NEVER HOLD POSITIONS OF POWER IN SOCIETY. They simply do not have the capacity to be impartial and fair, consistently across the populace.
I mean, everyone has known this throughout recorded history. It is only in the last 100 years we experimented with women controlling societies. It is utter, abject failure on every measureable outcome.
Ehhhh. Maybe it's because of women, but I think the bigger culprit is the extension of suffrage to every adult with or without a pulse. People by and large don't make good, politically informed voters.
Can you show me the evidence from 'recorded history'?
[Catherine the Great and Elizabeth I have entered the chat.]
https://archive.is/NtZla
Just in case anyone wants to call me a liar. This one is the "air conditioning is sexist" freak.
I'll speak to the "air conditioning is sexist" line, but from the other end of the spectrum. The AC in my section of the building where I work is controlled by the women. One day in the middle of winter I was literally freezing my nips off, and there was cool air blowing from the ceiling vents. I go and check the thermostat, and it's set for the lowest setting. I did a quick whip-around the department and lo and behold all of these women have blankets over their laps and/or space heaters under their desks. Because so many of these women were post-wall and pre-menopausal, they had the heat turned all the way down so they could deal with their hot flashes, but then they bundled up because they were otherwise too cold. And heaven help me if I had tried to say anything about it to any of them. I just took to slowly nudging the thing back up every night before I went home since I was usually the last one out the door.
You would think, but menopause does weird shit to women's body chemistry and apparently there were enough of them in the department dealing with hot flashes that the rest of them were okay with just running their heaters + blankets in dealing with the chill. That whole section of the building was the bane of our existence in IT, because their stupid heaters would either overload the circuit in their wing and pop the breakers, or they'd constantly have issues with the towers under their desks overheating because they'd aim their personal heater damn near right at it.
just ignore wapo. It’s trash, just like it’s owner.
I'm aware, but I'm just trying to point out the divisive journalism is from feminist women. They're trying to make us fight each other.
Translation: I am a frigid bitch.
If a such thing existed, they'd call it a date rape drug.
You can't win.
This is a perfect illustration of the evil inherent in equity politics.
Virtually every boner drug is based on a purely accidental discovery.
So what course of action would satisfy female equity in this situation?
Refusing to develop these drugs until a female equivalent is found.
They would deny a treatment to men simply because no equivalent treatment exists for women.
Germans created a drug in the 30s that solved this, it was called Pervitin. Straight, high dose meth for the meth, baby.
Woke white women are insufferable.
If convicting someone of charges of which they are not guilty due to racial considerations is "justice", then I can only hope that this is true.