OH? Dipshit? Really should I? Should i start with the ones that didn't have women voters around? Or weren't living in societies run and controlled by women?
Yes. Incredible though it seems, even you come from an unbroken line of winners. Looks like you will be the first loser who will be a genetic dead end, for which we can thank the heavens, by the way.
Society controlled by women? What a nutty thing to say.
well the system won't self correct so you're looking at either waiting for it to collapse and reform then, or instigate the collapse, seize power and shape the new system in a way that serves your interests.
Basically prepare for war or wait for anarchy and maneuver yourself into a position of power and influence in the emerging system to ensure you get what you want.
It certainly is an answer as to whether or not one should make the a priori assumption that half the human population is 'not to be trusted'.
It's true that many more women now have their minds poisoned by identitarian victim ideologies. But same is true for everyone. One should look at the ideology.
Nah. If it's in any way relevant to the conversation. Of course, you have people who like to bring up irrelevant points in order to blacken one group or another.
As every stock trader app ad will tell you : "Past performance doesn't guarantee future results."
If something has been true for all of human history, it's quite unlikely that it will suddenly change. If a stock has been rising since 250,000 BC until this very moment, I'd bet on it.
Just because things were okay at one point, doesn't mean they are now or ever will be again.
But I am not talking about 'things'. I agree that 'things' are messed up. Claims about the inherent trustworthiness or untrustworthiness of half the population (either half) are not about that though. Human nature does not change on a whim.
If you want to ask about the nature of half the population, I'm sure he knows. Or maybe he's embittered if he's had 4 divorces and got screwed every time.
Ask all your male ancestors.
All my male ancestors were trans.
The patriarchy wins again!
OH? Dipshit? Really should I? Should i start with the ones that didn't have women voters around? Or weren't living in societies run and controlled by women?
Yes. Incredible though it seems, even you come from an unbroken line of winners. Looks like you will be the first loser who will be a genetic dead end, for which we can thank the heavens, by the way.
Society controlled by women? What a nutty thing to say.
That's not an answer. The system wasn't like this in 200 BC, or even 1200 AD.
So fix the system?
Good luck with that. Do you have any ideas?
well the system won't self correct so you're looking at either waiting for it to collapse and reform then, or instigate the collapse, seize power and shape the new system in a way that serves your interests.
Basically prepare for war or wait for anarchy and maneuver yourself into a position of power and influence in the emerging system to ensure you get what you want.
It certainly is an answer as to whether or not one should make the a priori assumption that half the human population is 'not to be trusted'.
It's true that many more women now have their minds poisoned by identitarian victim ideologies. But same is true for everyone. One should look at the ideology.
Just not too closely at the ideology, or else you might start questioning where it came from.
Then BAM. R16 violation.
Nah. If it's in any way relevant to the conversation. Of course, you have people who like to bring up irrelevant points in order to blacken one group or another.
As every stock trader app ad will tell you : "Past performance doesn't guarantee future results."
Just because things were okay at one point, doesn't mean they are now or ever will be again.
If something has been true for all of human history, it's quite unlikely that it will suddenly change. If a stock has been rising since 250,000 BC until this very moment, I'd bet on it.
But I am not talking about 'things'. I agree that 'things' are messed up. Claims about the inherent trustworthiness or untrustworthiness of half the population (either half) are not about that though. Human nature does not change on a whim.
There's only one I can actually ask things but I doubt a retiree knows more about current sex politics than the shut-in who lives with him.
If you want to ask about the nature of half the population, I'm sure he knows. Or maybe he's embittered if he's had 4 divorces and got screwed every time.