Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

56
Scientists Warn Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines May Cause Blood Clots, Too (childrenshealthdefense.org)
posted 5 years ago by onetruephilosoraptor 5 years ago by onetruephilosoraptor +56 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 9 ▼
– Gizortnik 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

It is not clear if the lockdown saved more lives than it ended. It probably did.

Hmmmmmm. I think the lockdowns probably killed more people than they saved.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Depends on what you posit as an alternative. If it's 'doing nothing', then they definitely saved more lives than they took. If the alternative is 'protecting vulnerable groups and leaving the rest alone', then probably yes.

Note that I am not asserting that the politicians did anything to save lives. I know they couldn't give a damn about that.

Anyway, if the lockdown took more lives than it saved, then the vaccines are definitely the better of the two - since even if all cases of death can be attributed to them, they kill a fraction of the number they save.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Gizortnik 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Depends on what you posit as an alternative. If it's 'doing nothing', then they definitely saved more lives than they took. If the alternative is 'protecting vulnerable groups and leaving the rest alone', then probably yes.

I'm more along the lines of: they spread the disease in residences and also caused a dramatic increase in suicides, risky behavior, and violence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I am aware of those latter three things. Compared to the Swedish model of basically doing every little to nothing, my guess is that these caused less death than the lockdown saved. If you did it in a smart way, maybe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Gizortnik 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I'm not so sure because it seems like herd immunity was able to be acquired faster through a lack of protective measure. It creates a surge in medical demand (the actual reason why COVID was dangerous), but causes effectively no after-effects because the disease is endemic and herd immunity takes hold with as less lethal strains of the virus are produced.

On the other hand, the lockdowns prevented herd immunity, and worse: guaranteed exposure in households to the virus, spreading it further while slowing the introduction of herd immunity, and disincentivizing activities that would boost immune responses, and causing people to come out of isolation and get exposed to the virus when they hadn't previously, rather than being exposed to a less dangerous strain. This effectively lengthens the time period where the most deaths take place.

You're literally flattening the curve. Instead of 75,000 Americans dying in a month, you get 150,000 dying over a year, and that's not counting the added suicides, overdoses, and crime spikes.

It reminds me a lot of The Great Depression in America which was effectively started as a tractor bubble. Policies designed to save the economy from the damage of the bubble bursting actually lengthened and economic slowdown for 12 years unnecessarily, when if nothing had been done, the American economy could have recovered within 2.

The Democrats and Keynesians "flattened the curve" of deflation, and caused the worst economic disaster in American history. After The Great Recession, these same people caused the slowest economic recovery in American history, taking about 8 years, while Wall Street was good by February of 2009.

Like I said, I'd be willing to bet that COVID deaths in the US are probably 10x higher than if we had done nothing at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy