This is a paper written by two European scientists, an Englishman and a German, addressed to several government agencies responsible for vaccine distribution in both Europe and the USA, asking them to reconsider distributing the Pfizer vaccine. The whole thing is a worthwhile read if you don't mind translating scientific jargon, it covers multiple topics including the problems with the vaccine trials themselves, as well as inaccurate methods used for Covid testing, but this is the part that specifically caught my eye
Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 .....
...... which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.
There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile (emphasis mine)
Now, knowing this, and knowing that
-
individuals behind these mRNA vaccines (like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab for instance), have for years spoken about the need for population control
-
the vaccine companies are, by law, totally immune to any liablity or damage caused by their products
Does anyone think this is a coincidence?
Paternalism.
Fundamentally, a lot of the authoritarianism is generated by people who are responding to resentment against their positions of power. So they use the wealth and success that they have to grant themselves power that will then be used in a very paternalistic and protectionist way to "take care of" people who didn't succeed as much as the powerful did.
This doesn't quell resentment in the way that the paternalists faced originally. Instead, it stokes it. Like pulling at a Chinese finger trap, the more effort you put into paternalism, the more resentful people become because the reason people were resentful is because they wanted what you had, and now it looks like you're controlling everything... which is true if you engaged in paternalism.
Worse, the paternalists get angry that they're being greeted with more resentment so they start absolutely lashing out at dissent screaming that they know what's best for you. They'll get violent because they feel slighted by people they genuinely were originally trying to help by gifting them shit.
So has the paternalists become more violent, they balkanize everyone below them into zealots that worship them and antagonists that want to see them dead.
Eventually, the violence of the elites promotes their purging by others. Which does not solve the problem either, because the replaced group will stand there and say that they will engage in paternalism for the right people and things will be better... which furthers balkanization and resentment.
Eventually, hopefully, some group of people assume power and control and don't engage in paternalism, and the society will begin to recover.
Paternalism? The mini leftists actively aided in their own suicide.
Yes, because they were uplifting an aggrieved people. They would care for them because the other filthy Kadets who weren't empathetic enough to care for them.