This is a paper written by two European scientists, an Englishman and a German, addressed to several government agencies responsible for vaccine distribution in both Europe and the USA, asking them to reconsider distributing the Pfizer vaccine. The whole thing is a worthwhile read if you don't mind translating scientific jargon, it covers multiple topics including the problems with the vaccine trials themselves, as well as inaccurate methods used for Covid testing, but this is the part that specifically caught my eye
Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 .....
...... which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.
There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile (emphasis mine)
Now, knowing this, and knowing that
-
individuals behind these mRNA vaccines (like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab for instance), have for years spoken about the need for population control
-
the vaccine companies are, by law, totally immune to any liablity or damage caused by their products
Does anyone think this is a coincidence?
Devils advocate here:
Bolding the sentence directly before changes the overall meaning.
Separate topic on Schwab and Gates talking about population control:
What exactly have they said? Because world population is already decreasing on it's own. And how would a decreasing population help established economic globalists? Population "control" implies controlled growth, that is under their control, which is a separate thing from "population reduction"
Because le radical solution to the climate apocalypse.
But the population has already been reduced by 3-5 billion people. It's just going to take a few decades to filter through, there's no way to speed it up without killing off a few billion people.