Stereotypes are among the most reproducible phenomena in all of social science. On a population level, they are true.
Not only are stereotypes reproducible, but the role they play in inter-personal interactions is fairly well understood:
Considerable evidence has accumulated that people usually (though not always) apply their stereotypes in a largely rational manner, relying heavily on stereotypes in the absence of clear individuating information, but relying heavily on relevant individuating information when it is available
Of course you would want to adopt a laser focus on the individual from a policy perspective.
Otherwise you create a purely collectivist and tyrannical society where individual actions are irrelevant. Doesn't matter if you rob a bank or not, you are Amish, and are therefore not known for robbing banks.
Similarly, if you didn't rob a bank, or weren't even on the scene, but you're a former bank robber, you must be guilty of robbing the bank.
You're appealing to the literal "prosecutor's fallacy".
Not only are stereotypes reproducible, but the role they play in inter-personal interactions is fairly well understood:
- Stereotype Accuracy: One of the Largest and Most Replicable Effects in All of Social Psychology, a chapter from the Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination
So we already do "adopt a laser focus on the individual".
Not from a policy perspective.
Of course you would want to adopt a laser focus on the individual from a policy perspective.
Otherwise you create a purely collectivist and tyrannical society where individual actions are irrelevant. Doesn't matter if you rob a bank or not, you are Amish, and are therefore not known for robbing banks.
Similarly, if you didn't rob a bank, or weren't even on the scene, but you're a former bank robber, you must be guilty of robbing the bank.
You're appealing to the literal "prosecutor's fallacy".