I'm not really sure how under Styx's conception of libertarianism he deals with things like Drag Queen Story Hour. I know he's big on parents teaching values to children, but that doesn't address the scenario where you have one pervert who decides to go to the library in drag and read to kids, and now all of a sudden you have Drag Queen Story Hour because you're apparently not allowed to tell the guy to fuck off.
I'd imagine he does it the same way he deals with most things he can't actually address: the endless recitation of "who cares?" He's been doing it more and more lately and it's starting to irritate me. Just because he doesn't care on account of having questionable moral fortitude doesn't mean other people don't care or shouldn't care.
Can't help but wonder if he's trying to convince his audience or himself. He severely underestimated the amount of rot that had set in the system (a lot of us did, in fairness). That had a huge effect on me, but fortunately I'm not a public figure so I'm more free to say "well this is a problem I think should be fixed, and libertarianism can't fix it; so I guess I'm no longer a libertarian"
While encouraging and facilitating the transition of minors is definitely bad and that laws to prevent this will likely not affect free speech, I am not sure how to prevent the spread of extremist propaganda without actively persecuting said extremists.
Our enemies don't have a problem with this: they classify us "extremists" and everything we say "hate speech" and use the full state industrial complex to shut us down. Maybe the only way to fight back is to do the same, until we win.
You don't libertarian your way into a libertarian society.
I'm not really sure how under Styx's conception of libertarianism he deals with things like Drag Queen Story Hour. I know he's big on parents teaching values to children, but that doesn't address the scenario where you have one pervert who decides to go to the library in drag and read to kids, and now all of a sudden you have Drag Queen Story Hour because you're apparently not allowed to tell the guy to fuck off.
I'd imagine he does it the same way he deals with most things he can't actually address: the endless recitation of "who cares?" He's been doing it more and more lately and it's starting to irritate me. Just because he doesn't care on account of having questionable moral fortitude doesn't mean other people don't care or shouldn't care.
Can't help but wonder if he's trying to convince his audience or himself. He severely underestimated the amount of rot that had set in the system (a lot of us did, in fairness). That had a huge effect on me, but fortunately I'm not a public figure so I'm more free to say "well this is a problem I think should be fixed, and libertarianism can't fix it; so I guess I'm no longer a libertarian"
Libertarianism deterritorialization can only fuel socialist reterritorialization. He plays a part in the leftist dialectic.
While encouraging and facilitating the transition of minors is definitely bad and that laws to prevent this will likely not affect free speech, I am not sure how to prevent the spread of extremist propaganda without actively persecuting said extremists.
Our enemies don't have a problem with this: they classify us "extremists" and everything we say "hate speech" and use the full state industrial complex to shut us down. Maybe the only way to fight back is to do the same, until we win.
You don't libertarian your way into a libertarian society.