Nope. Unless you can prove they want to go after actual kids you cannot call someone pedophile. Lest you want to downplay the word to the point people don't know whether you are talking about people hurting actual kids or people who like anime..
Ah so someone DID have the balls to stick their neck out on this one. I was wondering who had Rag so worked up.
Well, let's just cut straight to the point shall we?
You ALSO are mixing terms, just like the SJWs. You absolutely CAN call them a pedophile. The terms you CAN'T call them are child molester or statutory rapist.
Is loli art pedophilic? Yes. .
Is it child pornography? No, by definition.
The law exists to prevent sexual exploitation of children. Loli art exists in the realm of being technically legal but morally reprehensible. So yes, it is absolutely appropriate to call them pedophiles.
No. There's already a word for it called lolicon. As I said unless you can prove someone goes after actual kids you can't call them pedophile. The only reason people try to claim "pedophile" is to be inflamatory and disingenuous and muddy the waters to bring in actual kids.
And the only reason people claim there's a distinction is because they want to muddy the waters and convince themselves that they aren't human trash.
I've worked anime conventions for 15 years, I've seen enough of your supposed "lolicons" turn out to be actual predators to have no delusions. It's all Freudian, and I doubt the motives of anyone who defends it.
There are a lot of anti Loli that turned out to be pedos too what's your point? And a pedo is a pedo. Not a lolicon. If a lolicon has not done anything incriminating than they are not pedo . (Though personally I have not actually seen any lolicons turn out to be actual pedo )
Nope. Unless you can prove they want to go after actual kids you cannot call someone pedophile. Lest you want to downplay the word to the point people don't know whether you are talking about people hurting actual kids or people who like anime..
Ah so someone DID have the balls to stick their neck out on this one. I was wondering who had Rag so worked up.
Well, let's just cut straight to the point shall we?
You ALSO are mixing terms, just like the SJWs. You absolutely CAN call them a pedophile. The terms you CAN'T call them are child molester or statutory rapist.
Is loli art pedophilic? Yes. .
Is it child pornography? No, by definition.
The law exists to prevent sexual exploitation of children. Loli art exists in the realm of being technically legal but morally reprehensible. So yes, it is absolutely appropriate to call them pedophiles.
No. There's already a word for it called lolicon. As I said unless you can prove someone goes after actual kids you can't call them pedophile. The only reason people try to claim "pedophile" is to be inflamatory and disingenuous and muddy the waters to bring in actual kids.
And the only reason people claim there's a distinction is because they want to muddy the waters and convince themselves that they aren't human trash.
I've worked anime conventions for 15 years, I've seen enough of your supposed "lolicons" turn out to be actual predators to have no delusions. It's all Freudian, and I doubt the motives of anyone who defends it.
There are a lot of anti Loli that turned out to be pedos too what's your point? And a pedo is a pedo. Not a lolicon. If a lolicon has not done anything incriminating than they are not pedo . (Though personally I have not actually seen any lolicons turn out to be actual pedo )
Not really. And you haven't said anything except ad honinems.
I literally answered your question but you didn't answer mine before and we know why and I'm not going to argue with a broken record.