Ah so someone DID have the balls to stick their neck out on this one. I was wondering who had Rag so worked up.
Well, let's just cut straight to the point shall we?
You ALSO are mixing terms, just like the SJWs. You absolutely CAN call them a pedophile. The terms you CAN'T call them are child molester or statutory rapist.
Is loli art pedophilic? Yes. .
Is it child pornography? No, by definition.
The law exists to prevent sexual exploitation of children. Loli art exists in the realm of being technically legal but morally reprehensible. So yes, it is absolutely appropriate to call them pedophiles.
No. There's already a word for it called lolicon. As I said unless you can prove someone goes after actual kids you can't call them pedophile. The only reason people try to claim "pedophile" is to be inflamatory and disingenuous and muddy the waters to bring in actual kids.
And the only reason people claim there's a distinction is because they want to muddy the waters and convince themselves that they aren't human trash.
I've worked anime conventions for 15 years, I've seen enough of your supposed "lolicons" turn out to be actual predators to have no delusions. It's all Freudian, and I doubt the motives of anyone who defends it.
There are a lot of anti Loli that turned out to be pedos too what's your point? And a pedo is a pedo. Not a lolicon. If a lolicon has not done anything incriminating than they are not pedo . (Though personally I have not actually seen any lolicons turn out to be actual pedo )
Ah so someone DID have the balls to stick their neck out on this one. I was wondering who had Rag so worked up.
Well, let's just cut straight to the point shall we?
You ALSO are mixing terms, just like the SJWs. You absolutely CAN call them a pedophile. The terms you CAN'T call them are child molester or statutory rapist.
Is loli art pedophilic? Yes. .
Is it child pornography? No, by definition.
The law exists to prevent sexual exploitation of children. Loli art exists in the realm of being technically legal but morally reprehensible. So yes, it is absolutely appropriate to call them pedophiles.
No. There's already a word for it called lolicon. As I said unless you can prove someone goes after actual kids you can't call them pedophile. The only reason people try to claim "pedophile" is to be inflamatory and disingenuous and muddy the waters to bring in actual kids.
And the only reason people claim there's a distinction is because they want to muddy the waters and convince themselves that they aren't human trash.
I've worked anime conventions for 15 years, I've seen enough of your supposed "lolicons" turn out to be actual predators to have no delusions. It's all Freudian, and I doubt the motives of anyone who defends it.
There are a lot of anti Loli that turned out to be pedos too what's your point? And a pedo is a pedo. Not a lolicon. If a lolicon has not done anything incriminating than they are not pedo . (Though personally I have not actually seen any lolicons turn out to be actual pedo )
They aren't a criminal. Also that's the wrong tense. It should be "then" not "than".
Look, think of it as a venn diagram.
There's a big circle, "pedophile", and inside of it are two smaller circles that partially overlap, labeled "lolicon" and "criminals".
The big circle is simply the animus of being attracted to prepubescent children.
You are trying to assert that there are lolicons who don't have that animus. That's obviously false, they clearly do have that animus.
Not really. And you haven't said anything except ad honinems.