I find their banter funny. It's way better than leftist banter, which if you're really lucky makes it to the third message before it devolves to nothing but insults.
Healthy by what metric? They weren't happy being stuck at home and the amount of references to bad wives in old entertainment is clear evidence men weren't happy either.
Unless technology saved us. Without being held back by diversity quotas, who knows what could be achieved. But even so, it would be the greatest generation in human history, with the most accomplishments.
I don't give the slightest damn about anyone's "happiness", which really is irrelevant. That said, anyone will be happier when acting in accordance with his biology, which is why women have become unhappier as they have started acting like men.
Without being held back by diversity quotas, who knows what could be achieved. But even so, it would be the greatest generation in human history, with the most accomplishments.
Men are not going to try to accomplish anything when that status is not linked to their evolutionary purpose, which is making copies of themselves. And even if they did, your Great Society would die out in 1 generation. Such a great place. You should have done it 120 years ao.
You know they do what's known as lie when asked about these things? What would happen if they said "Yeah, we're happy." - the privilege train would stop running, the position they had achieved at that point would be the best they'd ever get. Sometimes I think you deliberately believe them, just to try and catch me out, despite knowing the obvious reasons for them to lie.
Don't most great minds never reproduce, because they aren't interesting to women?
You're correct that the pendulum will swing, but measures could be taken to limit globohomo little hat influence, and the pendulum wouldn't have to swing so drastically.
The problem is their physical weakness. That is not a problem anyone created. But their (feminists) inability to admit that they differ from men biologically leads them to blame everything but the actual cause, and to fail to find solutions for such problems as actually exist - like violence against women.
Why are you so obsessed with non-mental biological differences as an explanation for all this?
It never made sense, the murder rate is lower now than it was before. If it was real fear, they'd have acted ages ago. It's opportunistic hate, seeing the weakness in a society and trying to use it to push female supremacy into action.
Why are you so obsessed with non-mental biological differences as an explanation for all this?
Because it's perfectly logical that they feel unsafe, which you won't understand given your size.
It never made sense, the murder rate is lower now than it was before
Nah, I don't accept the leftist "crime has declined since an arbitrary date I chose, so you have to be fine with its present level". Crime can still be too high even if it has been declining.
If it was real fear, they'd have acted ages ago.
Are you denying that women are afraid? That is quite odd, because even I am afraid for them when they are either out at night or alone with strangers, and make sure to try to escort women I know when I can. But maybe that is just the Middle Easterner in me.
It's opportunistic hate, seeing the weakness in a society and trying to use it to push female supremacy into action.
That no doubt is the reason for feminist shrews, but that is no reason to doubt that there are many instances that women are unsafe because of their physical weakness, which as I said you will never understand.
I don't live there. But when I did, I had far more reason to fear them, given their insane amount of legal privileges.
But feminists weren't complaining about it before. They chose to now because they now think the country is weak enough to be quietly taken over, and with a man in charge, no one will ever work out who's pulling the strings.
I'm denying they have a reason to be. Their delusions about being hunted down like they dream about for us are nothing more than projection. That might be the most soy thing you've ever said, by the way.
More men are killed by women's badly raised progeny.
But when I did, I had far more reason to fear them,
The thought of you running away at night when a 5'1" woman approaches is quite amusing.
But feminists weren't complaining about it before.
Where were you? They've been complaining about violence for ages.
Their delusions about being hunted down like they dream about for us
Nah, the only delusion is yours that women want to 'hunt you down'. In reality, more women are killed and attacked by men than vice versa.
More men are killed by women's badly raised progeny.
I love that you haven't had the wits to run away from that retarded argument. It's the dumbest thing I've seen, even from you, and that's saying something.
I'm more scared of women than a bad neighborhood in a mostly white city, when you get black and migrant neighborhoods and those overall situations you might be able to make a case that they would just kill a white person for no reason but that's about it.
If I'm drunk walking home at night, it's way more likely that some girl will try to make something up for attention than me getting mugged or jumped.
Stab-proof is fine. Anything rated for ballistics, though, would be questionable.
Though you might find it raises a question of intent. If you get into trouble wearing a stab vest, the question would naturally be asked if you were fishing for trouble in the first place.
I think I'd be more likely to see these things on the Grammys, a party and state approved production, than walking around any city I've been to. While I've not been to London, I have been to quite a few cities.
I was on a local forum where some cuck was saying men need to start taking pills to reduce their masculinity. The feminists seen no issue with this; the same feminists where getting outraged anytime a man came into to the thread to simply say that all men aren't predators. The emotionalism was off the wall. There was literally no point even trying to argue with these lunatics.
Normally, I'd excuse it as holding up a retarded mirror to the retardation of retards, but with you, I suspect that you actually believe this claptrap.
I mean, by the same logic they are using, mine makes infinitely more sense.
I just love that while they tighten their grip on our throat, people are worrying about if our words are too harsh. Maybe they are, but can we worry about that after we stop the hand tightening around our necks?
I mean, by the same logic they are using, mine makes infinitely more sense.
No, it really doesn't. I cringe every time you try to do that, because it echoes the hideous trannies trying to blame their 40% suicide rate on everyone but themselves. No one is responsible for any 'suicide' but the individual himself. If Jews in Nazi Germany managed to be able not to kill themselves, hideous trannies are capable of the same great feat.
I just love that while they tighten their grip on our throat
You're comparing people with an active mental condition and horribly flawed and regrettable surgery pushed by women to people who are hated purely for the conditions of their birth.
But one group has a much more obvious reason for suicide, while the other doesn't. You're conflating two very different groups and it's skewing the data.
Whenever I see one of your posts with > 10 comments within 1 hour of you posting it I know you've said something to set AoV off.
At least they look active, I suppose.
I find their banter funny. It's way better than leftist banter, which if you're really lucky makes it to the third message before it devolves to nothing but insults.
Even in this nonsense, they have to inject their race-baiting.
I thought that was cultural enrichment?
Cause we're not responsible for your paranoid disorders?
The arrogance of this. Shove it up your stinking, diseased cunt, cunt.
Tell that to Tara Reade.
Feminism is a disease.
But we are. That's what they keep making happen. They create a problem, blame us, force it through government.
More importantly, we allow it. Lolbertarianism is doomed because of bad actors. Authoritarianism has its proper place, and we're nearing it.
Except that it'll just be subverted again.
AuthRight is tradcon bullshit that will end up selling out for increased birth rates.
AuthLeft is already in their pocket.
Tradcons are the only ones who ever created a healthy society.
You? A society run by your precepts would die out in a generation. But hey, at least you'd have a lot of Ferraris.
Healthy by what metric? They weren't happy being stuck at home and the amount of references to bad wives in old entertainment is clear evidence men weren't happy either.
Unless technology saved us. Without being held back by diversity quotas, who knows what could be achieved. But even so, it would be the greatest generation in human history, with the most accomplishments.
I don't give the slightest damn about anyone's "happiness", which really is irrelevant. That said, anyone will be happier when acting in accordance with his biology, which is why women have become unhappier as they have started acting like men.
Men are not going to try to accomplish anything when that status is not linked to their evolutionary purpose, which is making copies of themselves. And even if they did, your Great Society would die out in 1 generation. Such a great place. You should have done it 120 years ao.
You know they do what's known as lie when asked about these things? What would happen if they said "Yeah, we're happy." - the privilege train would stop running, the position they had achieved at that point would be the best they'd ever get. Sometimes I think you deliberately believe them, just to try and catch me out, despite knowing the obvious reasons for them to lie.
Don't most great minds never reproduce, because they aren't interesting to women?
You're correct that the pendulum will swing, but measures could be taken to limit globohomo little hat influence, and the pendulum wouldn't have to swing so drastically.
The problem is their physical weakness. That is not a problem anyone created. But their (feminists) inability to admit that they differ from men biologically leads them to blame everything but the actual cause, and to fail to find solutions for such problems as actually exist - like violence against women.
Why are you so obsessed with non-mental biological differences as an explanation for all this?
It never made sense, the murder rate is lower now than it was before. If it was real fear, they'd have acted ages ago. It's opportunistic hate, seeing the weakness in a society and trying to use it to push female supremacy into action.
Because it's perfectly logical that they feel unsafe, which you won't understand given your size.
Nah, I don't accept the leftist "crime has declined since an arbitrary date I chose, so you have to be fine with its present level". Crime can still be too high even if it has been declining.
Are you denying that women are afraid? That is quite odd, because even I am afraid for them when they are either out at night or alone with strangers, and make sure to try to escort women I know when I can. But maybe that is just the Middle Easterner in me.
That no doubt is the reason for feminist shrews, but that is no reason to doubt that there are many instances that women are unsafe because of their physical weakness, which as I said you will never understand.
I don't live there. But when I did, I had far more reason to fear them, given their insane amount of legal privileges.
But feminists weren't complaining about it before. They chose to now because they now think the country is weak enough to be quietly taken over, and with a man in charge, no one will ever work out who's pulling the strings.
I'm denying they have a reason to be. Their delusions about being hunted down like they dream about for us are nothing more than projection. That might be the most soy thing you've ever said, by the way.
More men are killed by women's badly raised progeny.
The thought of you running away at night when a 5'1" woman approaches is quite amusing.
Where were you? They've been complaining about violence for ages.
Nah, the only delusion is yours that women want to 'hunt you down'. In reality, more women are killed and attacked by men than vice versa.
I love that you haven't had the wits to run away from that retarded argument. It's the dumbest thing I've seen, even from you, and that's saying something.
I'm more scared of women than a bad neighborhood in a mostly white city, when you get black and migrant neighborhoods and those overall situations you might be able to make a case that they would just kill a white person for no reason but that's about it.
If I'm drunk walking home at night, it's way more likely that some girl will try to make something up for attention than me getting mugged or jumped.
If I ever go back, I'm bringing a stab proof vest. Is that even allowed?
Stab-proof is fine. Anything rated for ballistics, though, would be questionable.
Though you might find it raises a question of intent. If you get into trouble wearing a stab vest, the question would naturally be asked if you were fishing for trouble in the first place.
It's one thing to be afraid of people with acid, and quite another to know that every limp midget could get the better of you.
I think I'd be more likely to see these things on the Grammys, a party and state approved production, than walking around any city I've been to. While I've not been to London, I have been to quite a few cities.
Funny how these feminists always fall into one of three camps:
Forever Alone,
Political Lesbian,
Married to an absolute gigachad
The only letter to the editor she should get is "I'm not responsible for shit. Go fuck yourself. Maybe an orgasm would help"
I was on a local forum where some cuck was saying men need to start taking pills to reduce their masculinity. The feminists seen no issue with this; the same feminists where getting outraged anytime a man came into to the thread to simply say that all men aren't predators. The emotionalism was off the wall. There was literally no point even trying to argue with these lunatics.
Lol... just wait till they push the men far enough or if islam takes over. They gonna be beaten up and abused and itll be legal.
Comment Removed: Rule 16
Normally, I'd excuse it as holding up a retarded mirror to the retardation of retards, but with you, I suspect that you actually believe this claptrap.
I mean, by the same logic they are using, mine makes infinitely more sense.
I just love that while they tighten their grip on our throat, people are worrying about if our words are too harsh. Maybe they are, but can we worry about that after we stop the hand tightening around our necks?
No, it really doesn't. I cringe every time you try to do that, because it echoes the hideous trannies trying to blame their 40% suicide rate on everyone but themselves. No one is responsible for any 'suicide' but the individual himself. If Jews in Nazi Germany managed to be able not to kill themselves, hideous trannies are capable of the same great feat.
No one will ever have his grip on my throat.
You're comparing people with an active mental condition and horribly flawed and regrettable surgery
pushed by womento people who are hated purely for the conditions of their birth.No, I'm comparing one group of people claiming that other people's beliefs cause suicide to your claim of the same thing.
I reject that anyone but a suicide is to blame for the suicide, unless he was targeted as an individual.
But one group has a much more obvious reason for suicide, while the other doesn't. You're conflating two very different groups and it's skewing the data.
No... I'm pretty sure your BS is not a valid reason for suicide. If even you understand this, then I expect everyone to be able to understand it.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs