Healthy by what metric? They weren't happy being stuck at home and the amount of references to bad wives in old entertainment is clear evidence men weren't happy either.
Unless technology saved us. Without being held back by diversity quotas, who knows what could be achieved. But even so, it would be the greatest generation in human history, with the most accomplishments.
You're correct that the pendulum will swing, but measures could be taken to limit globohomo little hat influence, and the pendulum wouldn't have to swing so drastically.
The problem is their physical weakness. That is not a problem anyone created. But their (feminists) inability to admit that they differ from men biologically leads them to blame everything but the actual cause, and to fail to find solutions for such problems as actually exist - like violence against women.
Why are you so obsessed with non-mental biological differences as an explanation for all this?
It never made sense, the murder rate is lower now than it was before. If it was real fear, they'd have acted ages ago. It's opportunistic hate, seeing the weakness in a society and trying to use it to push female supremacy into action.
Why are you so obsessed with non-mental biological differences as an explanation for all this?
Because it's perfectly logical that they feel unsafe, which you won't understand given your size.
It never made sense, the murder rate is lower now than it was before
Nah, I don't accept the leftist "crime has declined since an arbitrary date I chose, so you have to be fine with its present level". Crime can still be too high even if it has been declining.
If it was real fear, they'd have acted ages ago.
Are you denying that women are afraid? That is quite odd, because even I am afraid for them when they are either out at night or alone with strangers, and make sure to try to escort women I know when I can. But maybe that is just the Middle Easterner in me.
It's opportunistic hate, seeing the weakness in a society and trying to use it to push female supremacy into action.
That no doubt is the reason for feminist shrews, but that is no reason to doubt that there are many instances that women are unsafe because of their physical weakness, which as I said you will never understand.
I don't live there. But when I did, I had far more reason to fear them, given their insane amount of legal privileges.
But feminists weren't complaining about it before. They chose to now because they now think the country is weak enough to be quietly taken over, and with a man in charge, no one will ever work out who's pulling the strings.
I'm denying they have a reason to be. Their delusions about being hunted down like they dream about for us are nothing more than projection. That might be the most soy thing you've ever said, by the way.
More men are killed by women's badly raised progeny.
But we are. That's what they keep making happen. They create a problem, blame us, force it through government.
More importantly, we allow it. Lolbertarianism is doomed because of bad actors. Authoritarianism has its proper place, and we're nearing it.
Except that it'll just be subverted again.
AuthRight is tradcon bullshit that will end up selling out for increased birth rates.
AuthLeft is already in their pocket.
Tradcons are the only ones who ever created a healthy society.
You? A society run by your precepts would die out in a generation. But hey, at least you'd have a lot of Ferraris.
Healthy by what metric? They weren't happy being stuck at home and the amount of references to bad wives in old entertainment is clear evidence men weren't happy either.
Unless technology saved us. Without being held back by diversity quotas, who knows what could be achieved. But even so, it would be the greatest generation in human history, with the most accomplishments.
You're correct that the pendulum will swing, but measures could be taken to limit globohomo little hat influence, and the pendulum wouldn't have to swing so drastically.
The problem is their physical weakness. That is not a problem anyone created. But their (feminists) inability to admit that they differ from men biologically leads them to blame everything but the actual cause, and to fail to find solutions for such problems as actually exist - like violence against women.
Why are you so obsessed with non-mental biological differences as an explanation for all this?
It never made sense, the murder rate is lower now than it was before. If it was real fear, they'd have acted ages ago. It's opportunistic hate, seeing the weakness in a society and trying to use it to push female supremacy into action.
Because it's perfectly logical that they feel unsafe, which you won't understand given your size.
Nah, I don't accept the leftist "crime has declined since an arbitrary date I chose, so you have to be fine with its present level". Crime can still be too high even if it has been declining.
Are you denying that women are afraid? That is quite odd, because even I am afraid for them when they are either out at night or alone with strangers, and make sure to try to escort women I know when I can. But maybe that is just the Middle Easterner in me.
That no doubt is the reason for feminist shrews, but that is no reason to doubt that there are many instances that women are unsafe because of their physical weakness, which as I said you will never understand.
I don't live there. But when I did, I had far more reason to fear them, given their insane amount of legal privileges.
But feminists weren't complaining about it before. They chose to now because they now think the country is weak enough to be quietly taken over, and with a man in charge, no one will ever work out who's pulling the strings.
I'm denying they have a reason to be. Their delusions about being hunted down like they dream about for us are nothing more than projection. That might be the most soy thing you've ever said, by the way.
More men are killed by women's badly raised progeny.