promote hate speech; undermine election integrity; disseminate intentional disinformation, conspiracy theories, or fake news; or authorize, encourage, or carry out violations of users' privacy
So basically, the state would get to define what “fake news” or “hate speech” is and then ban it.
Easy solution: GeoIP block everyone coming out of Colorado. If they attempt to prosecute you for operating a website without registering there, politely remind them that merely entering a service into the stream of commerce, without more, does not establish a business presence within a state... and they can go fuck themselves.
That said, raise a big stink and I don't see this passing.
So basically, the state would get to define what “fake news” or “hate speech” is and then ban it.
Well, judging by who wrote it, "misogyny" will be hate speech, but kill all men will be political policy.
Just in time to catch anyone complaining about how HR1 turns elections into a matter of who has the bigger printer?
Texas is opening, Mississippi is opening. A breath of relief for millions for the first time in a good year
Meanwhile in colorado... miles above where the aliens are buried
That got a good laugh from me. The blue eyed horse is a messenger.
Knew it was a woman before I even clicked.
The vaginas have been empowered.
Easy solution: GeoIP block everyone coming out of Colorado. If they attempt to prosecute you for operating a website without registering there, politely remind them that merely entering a service into the stream of commerce, without more, does not establish a business presence within a state... and they can go fuck themselves.
That said, raise a big stink and I don't see this passing.
Colorado's a great state. Nothing a neutron bomb over Boulder wouldn't fix.
i've said it before but i'll say it again:
pushing blatantly unconstitutional nonsense like this should have you summarily removed and maybe even executed.
Unironically agree at this point.
They never cease to continue surprising me in how far they will go.