promote hate speech; undermine election integrity; disseminate intentional disinformation, conspiracy theories, or fake news; or authorize, encourage, or carry out violations of users' privacy
So basically, the state would get to define what “fake news” or “hate speech” is and then ban it.
So basically, the state would get to define what “fake news” or “hate speech” is and then ban it.
Well, judging by who wrote it, "misogyny" will be hate speech, but kill all men will be political policy.
Just in time to catch anyone complaining about how HR1 turns elections into a matter of who has the bigger printer?