For this case I would recommend the beta tester argument.
Normally vaccine development takes about four years. This vaccine development was done in less than a year. This is pretty rushed testing.
Ask them why not wait to see if it has long term side effects and wait until those issues are fixed?
This specific argument avoids accusations of conspiracy theories and focuses on the fact that this experimental vaccine has not been fully tested as rigorously as other vaccines.
If they are not in a high risk group, why should they rush to take this vaccine?
This basically, tell them rushed production, no studies of long term effects, over-hyped infections of corona and why take it now and not in a year after it's had more testing.
For this case I would recommend the beta tester argument.
Normally vaccine development takes about four years. This vaccine development was done in less than a year. This is pretty rushed testing.
Ask them why not wait to see if it has long term side effects and wait until those issues are fixed?
This specific argument avoids accusations of conspiracy theories and focuses on the fact that this experimental vaccine has not been fully tested as rigorously as other vaccines.
If they are not in a high risk group, why should they rush to take this vaccine?
This basically, tell them rushed production, no studies of long term effects, over-hyped infections of corona and why take it now and not in a year after it's had more testing.
Good luck!
I hope they will see reason.