I've already seen it spun as "solid bipartisan support says Trump is guilty of insurrection."
While parts of this statement are technically almost sort of bordering on true, it's incredibly misleading, incorrect and, you know, not how trials work.
But, yeah, I've honestly seen people claiming that the outcome of this sham "trial" declares Trump guilty of insurrection. It's batshit insane, but there you have it.
Also the only trial where the judge is also one of the jurors! And lets not even get into the legal miscarriage arguments that can be when said judge has already deemed the defendant guilty before the trial.
I wonder how normies are going to rationalize this.
I've already seen it spun as "solid bipartisan support says Trump is guilty of insurrection."
While parts of this statement are technically almost sort of bordering on true, it's incredibly misleading, incorrect and, you know, not how trials work.
But, yeah, I've honestly seen people claiming that the outcome of this sham "trial" declares Trump guilty of insurrection. It's batshit insane, but there you have it.
The only trial where the witnesses also get to be jurors!
Also the only trial where the judge is also one of the jurors! And lets not even get into the legal miscarriage arguments that can be when said judge has already deemed the defendant guilty before the trial.
According to the prosecution, the constitution and due process don't matter. That was literally his argument.
It's the only trial I've seen where the original judge said, "Fuck it, I'm out"
i wonder if anyone's going to fall on the sword for putting fake evidence up