Modern Culture is Creating a Generation of Weak Men
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Just as the cycle dictates.
One can only wonder in awe what sort of giga-chads will inevitably be produced as a result of all this (hard times create strong men). Perhaps it is well that they are giga-chads, for they will have one hell of a mess to fix.
Gotta get to the hard times first.
Consider that the Americans who endured the financial panic of 1893 - which saw more than a third of New Yorkers unemployed - are the people who decided not just to nuke a city, but to nuke two of them.
Are you butthurt over Hiroshima or did I miss something
Probably something like this.
I'm not even anti-semitic, but Dovahhatty had me rolling on the floor with his "Jew" segments. Didn't he even play "le happy merchant" during the Great Jewish Revolt part?
I was considering linking that one, but I didn't realize there was a video made without the requirement of the timestamp. This is convenient for the future, thanks.
Can't even bypass with third party sites anymore.
Weak men? Maybe. But I think the real problem is brainwashed men. The elites running western society use our natural human instincts against us. Men's instinct to protect women is being used against men to give women more & more privileges, leaving men with less choices and less freedom.
The globalist corporate media tells men to either be submissive to get women or be dumb muscle for the elites to get women. You can bet that any female celebrity & any female politician that has body guards, only wants muscle-bound male body guards, no matter how much they might decry traditional masculinity or how much they claim to want women's equality in everything.
First, I'd like to point out that some of those videos are likely just people engaged in a humiliation fetish, rather than just simping per se. Those videos are of people who are basically getting their rocks off by what they're doing, and they know that they are humiliating themselves. So, it's not exactly the same, it's a bit more degenerate than you might see a simp do.
Second, I don't think it's a lack of self-expression that's the problem. While self-expression is stifled for men so that it no masculine self-expression is tolerated, I'd say that society is filled with overwhelming self-expression to the point that it's become an indistinguishable blur of random colors and shapes. Each person frantically trying to self-express more loudly and garishly than the person behind them, but no one is actually listening in order to care. A kind of deaf narcissism.
The problem that I see is that while the narrator recommends self-expression in a close knit community, I'd don't think most people have such a community. This goes back to the whole "Bowling Alone" concept, particularly about how predominantly white, straight, male social groupings have been otherwise eradicated, and every other group has been effectively balkanized by political activists.
There are no social groupings for most people to engage and commune with. This is typically where you would be developing long lasting friendships and intimate relationships, but these groups have been all but dissolved.
I'll put it like this, I know several people who are adults, are not nerds, have never been into any sort of gaming, and are in D&D groups because that is the closest thing to a social grouping that Gen X and afterwards effectively has at this point. They learned D&D, which is not a small feat for a normie, because there was nowhere else to go, and no one to associate with. Gaming with other people, even switching between gaming groups, is the closest mimic to a non-toxic social group that people under 40 effectively have if they aren't part of a devout religious community.
I think I've mentioned this before, but this is the real problem we face as a generation of people. The old, normal, social groups are all dead. And the only thing the normies have as outlet is the fucking bar where you drink yourself to death.
That's really bad.
We have to build whole new communities entirely from scratch, in the real world. We must be our own pillars, of our own communities, because there is nothing & no one to join. We have to dig our selves out of this hole in society, not so that we can benefit (we will likely get very little), but so that our grand-children will have something to look forward to.
What's the point in building when the enemy will bust down the door as soon as they notice?
Extreme vetting might work...up until it's big enough that they can file a sex discrimination lawsuit.
We need to be honest with ourselves and not waste time. The only way to return to normal, is to remove women's minority group status, which they never qualified for in the first place.
Wha? I.. you...
motherfucker
The point is that you build defenses so that when they kick the door their foot shatters. The point is to fight because they're going to attack. You fight a war to win one. Build a stronger door. Don't just whine and cry because the first one got knocked down
Let's pretend I'd agree to that. How are you going to go on the offensive for something that is already effectively untouchable to normies, when you gave up building a door.
If you want to attack, you have to have the logistics to do so first. Get the order right.
The defences don't work. Their subversion and destruction tactics are a well-oiled machine and nobody, not even myself, can stand against them.
If you get too big, they sue you.
If suing you doesn't work, their media assets will dig up anything they can find on you.
If that doesn't work, they threaten you with Mastercard. Ask the porn sites how that went.
Let's assume that you're just trying to build something for your local community and you'll never attract that kind of attention.
If you're weak enough to be swayed by affection, they use that against you.
If you let them in and try to make them stick to the rules, they just subvert your group.
If your other group members are weak to attention, they ostracize them so you get backstabbed.
If anyone in your group has a partner, they will get in as the "good woman" and proceed from there.
Building defenses against them is like trying to block gunfire with a medieval shield. Tactics have moved on and it's no longer useful.
The only way to defend is to try and take their weapons away.
Here, let me:
If you try to take their weapons away, you get shot.
If you try to think about taking your weapons away, they hypnotize your friends into turning you in.
If you manage to take their weapons away, the weapons will blow up in your hands.
Look! I can push retarded defeatist rhetoric too!
You can't win any engagement with no support system, no defense system, and only aggression. Whatever offensive action you take, it will peter out without logisitcs, you will not be able to launch a second strike without a base of operations, and you will be easily encircled.
All you've done in the previous comment is thrown some stupid black-pill complaints about the fact that they have tactics. Yes, congratulations. They do, in fact, have tactics. That does not negate the need for a defensive system. The idea that the concept of defense doesn't exist in politics and activism is such a fundamentally retarded claim it shouldn't require me to counter it.
See a problem. Because building a community is a hell of a lot more effort, time, and energy, for a very tenuous and abstract reward. Compared to the instant dopamine dump running a map in Path of Exile and picking up the currency that drops.
And I have, I think anyway, an acute awareness of the problem and understand this is the correct solution.
I see "neighborhood watch" signs on my block and have no fucking clue who to talk to about joining and what the hell they even do or even if they exist at all and aren't just signs.
Or want to find a church but either they are hardcore evangelical and I'm not really committed to the whole jesus thing, or they are subverted with women giving sermons.
Its a bootstrap problem where if you never really had connections and your family wasn't integrated into a neighborhood growing up, you don't know where to start and even if you make the effort you need to harden up to a lot of false starts and wasted effort.
I agree with a lot of that. Maybe not the women giving sermons stuff, but the fundamental point: we don't have a reference point to start with. That's why I'm kinda hoping we can use this place as a reference point.
find a church with a women giving sermons that isn't subverted, I haven't yet and have been researching diffrent churches/synagogues in my area for a few months
Doesn't really matter to me, I reject your god.
All that means to me is that there is a level of inherent weakness within your religious philosophy and traditions. Women want a patriarch of some nature, the fact that their sermons in your church do not reflect this is an internal problem that is deeper than some gatekeeping procedure.
Think of it like this: why would a woman want to lead a sermon if they had been acculturated to your religion's ideology.
A secular comparison of this might be the NFL. Why have no women ever played on a professional football team? There is no gatekeeping to stop them from trying. That first time get fucking spear'd is way more convincing. There is no desire for them to try or continue. It's a wasted effort. It's a bad idea with few positive benefits, particularly compared with doing anything else as a woman. If, on the other hand, women were all over the place in the NFL, playing quarterback and the like, that would suggest that there was something very strange happening to the culture of the NFL, who it's attracting, and who it's disincentivizing.
I'd say your focus would be to answer those questions for your religion first. Otherwise, even if you were to successfully gatekeep, it would only be a bandage over a sucking chest-wound.
You misspelled women's control of culture.