That was a different one, in California. Duke Lacrosse was a crazy girl accusing a lacrosse team of raping her, immediately after which a ton of the faculty wrote a full page advertisement in the local paper saying the story was true and Duke was full of misogyny and racism. The departmental makeup of the signing professors breaks down pretty much exactly as you'd expect, and if you didn't know the girl was black, you could figure it out by the number of signing African American Studies professors. The story received significant national coverage. Pretty much everyone involved acted like it was definitely true and proceeded to do their best to destroy the lives of the accused and anyone vaguely near them. This was all before any sort of investigation, because evidence is just the tool of the patriarchy. Then it ends up the location she claimed it happened in didn't exist, the guys couldn't have possibly been there, and there wasn't enough time for it to have happened. She went on to stab her boyfriend to death (Who must have been the stupidest man alive) a few years later. The professors who signed the first newspaper letter calling a bunch of innocent men rapists then went on to write and publish a second letter saying they weren't sorry and Duke was still full of racism and sexism.
Which part? Because the professors writing the two letters in the paper, the girl murdering her boyfriend after, and everyone treating the men like scum as they were guilty until proven innocent was definitely Duke (though the last part is obviously standard). The broken glass and room that didn't exist part, I guess?
That was a different one, in California. Duke Lacrosse was a crazy girl accusing a lacrosse team of raping her, immediately after which a ton of the faculty wrote a full page advertisement in the local paper saying the story was true and Duke was full of misogyny and racism. The departmental makeup of the signing professors breaks down pretty much exactly as you'd expect, and if you didn't know the girl was black, you could figure it out by the number of signing African American Studies professors. The story received significant national coverage. Pretty much everyone involved acted like it was definitely true and proceeded to do their best to destroy the lives of the accused and anyone vaguely near them. This was all before any sort of investigation, because evidence is just the tool of the patriarchy. Then it ends up the location she claimed it happened in didn't exist, the guys couldn't have possibly been there, and there wasn't enough time for it to have happened. She went on to stab her boyfriend to death (Who must have been the stupidest man alive) a few years later. The professors who signed the first newspaper letter calling a bunch of innocent men rapists then went on to write and publish a second letter saying they weren't sorry and Duke was still full of racism and sexism.
Duke lacrosse was a different one than the one you're describing. You're describing "a rape on campus" which was with a fraternity.
Which part? Because the professors writing the two letters in the paper, the girl murdering her boyfriend after, and everyone treating the men like scum as they were guilty until proven innocent was definitely Duke (though the last part is obviously standard). The broken glass and room that didn't exist part, I guess?
You're thinking of the UVA rape with "Jackie".
Duke Lacrosse was back in like 2007 with the black stripper who ended up going to prison after doing all kinds of other crazy crap.
[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus]Here's the one you're talking about.[/url]
Yes I know there's a ton of false rape stories.
Correct. The professors and the murder part was duke. The duke girl was a stripper hired for a party.
A rape on campus was the broken glass one with a student who claimed to be a party that never happened with someone no longer at the school.
Feminists totally aren't a threat guys, be scared of the Jews or something.