It amusing when you consider that America's freedom of expression, in its inception, was almost completely focused on freedom of the press. From what I read freedom of speech for the people was almost secondary. Yet now the press, want to destroy the freedoms of others.
doesnt your constitution refer to the 'printing press', as in freedom to own and operate one, not the propagandist mouthwhores that call themselves press today?
so transfered to modern times, it was written down to protect you exactly from the "press" of nowadays, who want to form an information cartel.
doesnt your constitution refer to the 'printing press', as in freedom to own and operate one, not the propagandist mouthwhores that call themselves press today?
It amusing when you consider that America's freedom of expression, in its inception, was almost completely focused on freedom of the press. From what I read freedom of speech for the people was almost secondary. Yet now the press, want to destroy the freedoms of others.
doesnt your constitution refer to the 'printing press', as in freedom to own and operate one, not the propagandist mouthwhores that call themselves press today?
so transfered to modern times, it was written down to protect you exactly from the "press" of nowadays, who want to form an information cartel.
Yes.