A Logical Refutation to Common Pro Lockdown Arguments | Reddit Link
(www.reddit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
What does unlawful searches and seizures have to do with lockdowns? If you were to argue the lockdowns were unconstitutional, surely it'd be on the basis of the 1st amendment's right to assemble.
Unlawful detention. The government has seized your person, and with tracing apps is unlawfully surveiling your movements.
The government is effectively placing you under house arrest without probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion. They are then fining and arresting you for violations of that unlawful detention.
It's not just peaceful assembly. That's for groups. I'm talking about your right to freely travel without being detained. You're not 'assembling' if you simply choose to go for a drive or walk. You're being detained if the government is forcing you to stop.
Ah, I see. My mind is going to the law of groups larger than X people or containing members of Y households.