The Tavistock Clinic is doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare. Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:
These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal, but somehow in bad taste. On the evening news, one sees handcuffed teachers, priests and Boy Scout leaders hustled into police vans. Therapists call them maladjusted, emotionally immature. But beauty has its own laws, inconsistent with Christian morality. As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of its civilization.
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate sit in somebody's lap or engage in sexual activity.
-Pat Califia, cited in Sexual Investigations by Soble
This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love... When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations.
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
But pederasty is probably historically the most common form of homosexuality in Western culture, as well as many other cultures. It exists in all cultures, and in some is considered the norm, even today (e.g., Iran, among the Pashtuns). To label it 'child abuse' or 'child molestation' is preposterous and stupid.
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
Didn't you get the memo - they're not your children any more, it seems, they belong to the government. If you're very good you might be allowed to look after them for a while.
Why stop here? Obviously this new batch of children is way more advanced than they were when I was young.
alcohol
cigarettes
prescription medicine
guns
If the children want them, they should have them. I mean, these things aren't worse than hormone-bombs that irreversibly change their bodies, are they?
And then you get to the really nasty stuff. Voting, which would drastically reshape societal structure by giving easily swayed people who aren't capable of making informed decisions power over elections, and the people who have power over them get even more power.
As if that wasn't bad enough, you get into the really nasty stuff, that they didn't even want to touch on in the video; sex changes, and sex itself. If a child were said to be competent enough to make decisions in some areas, why not others? It's the nastiest of slippery slopes.
Also, even without thinking about what other actions this could lead to in regard to the 'child' component of this proposal, what about looking on the other end...the law itself? The State is saying it can change laws specifically to keep information from parents. Even if it doesn't lead to the nasty stuff, it's opened the door that it might. The government loses all credibility, and should immediately lose all future benefit of the doubt. They will go around a parent's choice, and do things to the younger generation. The generation which, down the line, may have children of their own. This is basically the State saying it doesn't need you, or anyone else. The State is malicious, and means to replace you.
parents can't make decisions for their children. Children are autonomous and it would infringe their rights
Children aren't fit to make these decisions. The government should decide for them
The sad thing is: There exist more than zero people that can hold both of these thoughts in their mind at the same time without experiencing any dissonance whatsoever. And some of them are in positions of power or worse (unelected idiots within the beaurocracy)
For now. Aren't they pushing to make government-run school mandatory and homeschooling illegal?
Next thing you know schools send children to mosques and when parents disagree they get fined (literally what's happening in Germany). Pray to Allah, bigot!
The 'kids can consent' argument marches on.
They're specifically making laws to do things to kids and specifically hide it from the parents.
Gosh golly gee, I wonder why they're trying to set a legal precedent that children can consent.
Don't you like liberty, YouAreAPirate?
u/TentElephant post the pasta
Back by popular demand, heeeeeres child rape.
The Tavistock Clinic is doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare. Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
-Pat Califia, cited in Sexual Investigations by Soble
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
Didn't you get the memo - they're not your children any more, it seems, they belong to the government. If you're very good you might be allowed to look after them for a while.
Why stop here? Obviously this new batch of children is way more advanced than they were when I was young.
If the children want them, they should have them. I mean, these things aren't worse than hormone-bombs that irreversibly change their bodies, are they?
Yeah, they talk about it a bit in the video.
You've also got stuff like driving, and tattoos.
And then you get to the really nasty stuff. Voting, which would drastically reshape societal structure by giving easily swayed people who aren't capable of making informed decisions power over elections, and the people who have power over them get even more power.
As if that wasn't bad enough, you get into the really nasty stuff, that they didn't even want to touch on in the video; sex changes, and sex itself. If a child were said to be competent enough to make decisions in some areas, why not others? It's the nastiest of slippery slopes.
Also, even without thinking about what other actions this could lead to in regard to the 'child' component of this proposal, what about looking on the other end...the law itself? The State is saying it can change laws specifically to keep information from parents. Even if it doesn't lead to the nasty stuff, it's opened the door that it might. The government loses all credibility, and should immediately lose all future benefit of the doubt. They will go around a parent's choice, and do things to the younger generation. The generation which, down the line, may have children of their own. This is basically the State saying it doesn't need you, or anyone else. The State is malicious, and means to replace you.
Consent of the governed? What's that?
The sad thing is: There exist more than zero people that can hold both of these thoughts in their mind at the same time without experiencing any dissonance whatsoever. And some of them are in positions of power or worse (unelected idiots within the beaurocracy)
Making it "Children can consent"
instead of "Vaccines that have gone though shit tons of testing are not harmful, so you don't need consent"
For now. Aren't they pushing to make government-run school mandatory and homeschooling illegal?
Next thing you know schools send children to mosques and when parents disagree they get fined (literally what's happening in Germany). Pray to Allah, bigot!
and if your kid rejects it for literally any reason, then they slander him on his permament record.