In this case, it was the wrong tool. A DNA test would be the way to go. It's non-invasive (just a check swab) and would have established if the woman is the mother of this child in particular, while the exam was invasive and just establishes if the woman is the mother of a child of the correct age.
No one tried to stop it. The people who recovered the baby were not punished. The people who raped the women were punished.
All of the women were innocent.
Who raped what now?
It absolutely is. Any form of penetration without permission is considered rape.
At least this time you talked about ideology, which is the correct thing to attack.
You seem to think so though. You connect any evil that you encounter anywhere to 'women'.
I don't think there is any such 'probably cause'.
In this case, it was the wrong tool. A DNA test would be the way to go. It's non-invasive (just a check swab) and would have established if the woman is the mother of this child in particular, while the exam was invasive and just establishes if the woman is the mother of a child of the correct age.
I agree 1000%. Many men are raped this way, as well. It's no less or more egrerious. And none of it should happen.
They didn't even have any reasonable probable cause here.
I wouldn't stand by and see men raped and say anything different. Please get out of your own pussy and be reasonable.