Jew is not a color. There are white Jews, among whom she is one, and brown ones, and even blacks.
I 'noticed' that you did not point out that the two women going after Wizards of the Coast for kneeling to SJWs had Jewish names. I wonder why. Apparently, you are only capable of 'noticing' Jewish names when it's someone doing something that you don't like.
I 'noticed' that you did not point out that the two women going after Wizards of the Coast for kneeling to SJWs had Jewish names. I wonder why. Apparently, you are only capable of 'noticing' Jewish names when it's someone doing something that you don't like.
Perhaps he just didn't care about the WotC post?
There's lots of really damn racist Jews. Not all Jews, obviously. But the really, overtly, openly racist people do seem to be disproportionately Jewish. I suspect it's because nobody calls them out for being overtly, openly racist.
I suggest, rather than accusing random people of anti-Semitism, how 'bout you go call out Chelsea Handler for being an overt racist instead?
I don't know of this individual specifically, but this is not typical of the type obsessed with Jews. In all the time that I have moderated KiA2, I have not once seen one of these 'noticers' 'notice' one of the many times when a Jew was dong something good and productive.
There's lots of really damn racist Jews.
Quite a lot. I don't think it has anything to do with them being Jews though. We must resist any attempt to try to smear an entire group, just because there are people in that group smearing other groups.
I suspect it's because nobody calls them out for being overtly, openly racist.
No one is called out for being racist when he is a SJW... Jew or not, white or black.
how 'bout you go call out Chelsea Handler for being an overt racist instead?
Jewish Nepotism is as old as the religion itself. They are culturally conditioned to be exclusive from outsider, this was mostly due to being a minority figure in most societies they existed in. Nepotism and wokeness go hand in hand as an economic strategy.
We readily and rightly point to the LGBTQ demographic as having radically outsized influence over media and policy given they account for only 3-5% of the population. How would you characterize a demographic that is even smaller possessing several orders of magnitude greater influence and power? It's funny, I don't see you demanding we "balance our coverage" with positive LGBTQ profiles...
Quite a lot. I don't think it has anything to do with them being Jews though.
Possibly, but that's not relevant to my point. It'd just be nice to have non-white racists held to the same standards as white racists are held to by us white people. We mostly keep 'our' people in check and don't tolerate that shit.
Look over my comments in this thread...
No, I mean go to her Twitter thread and make sure that everybody knows she's a racist. We already know this here.
This post is garbage. You know damn well why it matters that she’s Jewish: the moment someone tries to tear her down for being white, she'll fall back on "muh anti-Semitism!". This fundamentally transforms her anti-white posturing from brainwashed suicidal idiocy into a deceptive and malicious attack on an outgroup. And that outgroup is growing tired of the act.
You will never convince people to ignore this shit once they've seen it. If you're worried about the implications for Jewish people, go ahead and explain to them that this duplicity is going to bite them in the ass eventually - for the 100th plus time, give or take, right? I mean we're happy to point out that Muslims seem incapable of coexisting with any other religion, but I can think of some other demographics that fall into that category as well. We're just not allowed to talk about them.
You know damn well why it matters that she’s Jewish: the moment someone tries to tear her down for being white, she'll fall back on "muh anti-Semitism!".
Yeah, I doubt that a woman who supports Farrakhan is going to whine about anti-Semitism because of completely legitimate criticism of being anti-white.
This fundamentally transforms her anti-white posturing from brainwashed suicidal idiocy into a deceptive and malicious attack on an outgroup.
This is the best way that 'your side' has argued for this, and it speaks volumes that I have never seen one of you formulate it this intelligently and properly. I suggest you frame your criticism like this, instead of making it about Jew vs. non-Jew. It is completely legitimate, when a Jew who does not consider himself white attacks white people, to point out that he is attacking an outgroup.
For most of these Jews, this will not be applicable, as they consider themselves white and their comments are of the same nature as the loser white kneelers. A lot of these Jews even claim that white Jews have 'white privilege' - apparently that of having your family members be gassed.
If you're worried about the implications for Jewish people, go ahead and explain to them
I'm not at all concerned about the Chelsea Handlers of the world. I'm concerned about the many good Jews in the world, about whom the Chelsea Handlers and the Rothschilds of the world couldn't give a damn, because they are self-serving elites.
for the 100th plus time, give or take
And here's where you lose all credibility again. You let your rage at this group overtake your good sense. Even if you do hate them, if you want to be taken seriously, you have to frame your arguments in such a way that does not make it absolutely obvious that you have a bizarre, setting hatred for you.
I mean we're happy to point out that Muslims seem incapable of coexisting with any other religion, but I can think of some other demographics that fall into that category as well. We're just not allowed to talk about them.
Chelsea Handler's religion is Social Justice, not Judaism.
I 'noticed' that you did not point out that the two women going after Wizards of the Coast for kneeling to SJWs had Jewish names. I wonder why. Apparently, you are only capable of 'noticing' Jewish names when it's someone doing something that you don't like.
Uhhh, have you considered that maybe he doesn't hate all jews? This really is revealing of your own mindset in that you equate 'noticing' to indiscriminate hate.
Uhhh, have you considered that maybe he doesn't hate all jews?
Quite unlikely, because if he feels the need to bring attention to the fact that people he does not like are Jews, while not similarly feeling the need to bring attention to the fact that decent people are Jews, then this suggests what his motivations are.
This really is revealing of your own mindset in that you equate 'noticing' to indiscriminate hate.
It's in scare quotes for a reason. These people aren't 'noticing' squat, but rather, engaging in their ample confirmation bias.
This is the same argument I keep having with Auron over on GGdiscussion. The issue isn't with Jews, per se. The issue is their disproportionate representation among blue checks, academics and media figures with any clout pushing their anti white narrative. The other issue is that people go into defcon 5 when people point out the pattern, which makes the whole thing look really suspicious.
This is one reason why I like Dave Smith, he's a Jewish guy that has pointed this thing out and even agrees that there is an issue here. Being able to point this out is step one toward being able to address the narrative in any meaningful way.
I 'noticed' that you did not point out that the two women going after Wizards of the Coast for kneeling to SJWs had Jewish names. I wonder why. Apparently, you are only capable of 'noticing' Jewish names when it's someone doing something that you don't like.
Or more likely you are the only retard here who thinks that they are Jews. Or that Tracy Hickman is a woman for that matter. Get out glowie, you are not one of us.
She's Jewish my friend.
Jew is not a color. There are white Jews, among whom she is one, and brown ones, and even blacks.
I 'noticed' that you did not point out that the two women going after Wizards of the Coast for kneeling to SJWs had Jewish names. I wonder why. Apparently, you are only capable of 'noticing' Jewish names when it's someone doing something that you don't like.
Perhaps he just didn't care about the WotC post?
There's lots of really damn racist Jews. Not all Jews, obviously. But the really, overtly, openly racist people do seem to be disproportionately Jewish. I suspect it's because nobody calls them out for being overtly, openly racist.
I suggest, rather than accusing random people of anti-Semitism, how 'bout you go call out Chelsea Handler for being an overt racist instead?
I don't know of this individual specifically, but this is not typical of the type obsessed with Jews. In all the time that I have moderated KiA2, I have not once seen one of these 'noticers' 'notice' one of the many times when a Jew was dong something good and productive.
Quite a lot. I don't think it has anything to do with them being Jews though. We must resist any attempt to try to smear an entire group, just because there are people in that group smearing other groups.
No one is called out for being racist when he is a SJW... Jew or not, white or black.
Look over my comments in this thread...
Jewish Nepotism is as old as the religion itself. They are culturally conditioned to be exclusive from outsider, this was mostly due to being a minority figure in most societies they existed in. Nepotism and wokeness go hand in hand as an economic strategy.
We readily and rightly point to the LGBTQ demographic as having radically outsized influence over media and policy given they account for only 3-5% of the population. How would you characterize a demographic that is even smaller possessing several orders of magnitude greater influence and power? It's funny, I don't see you demanding we "balance our coverage" with positive LGBTQ profiles...
Possibly, but that's not relevant to my point. It'd just be nice to have non-white racists held to the same standards as white racists are held to by us white people. We mostly keep 'our' people in check and don't tolerate that shit.
No, I mean go to her Twitter thread and make sure that everybody knows she's a racist. We already know this here.
This post is garbage. You know damn well why it matters that she’s Jewish: the moment someone tries to tear her down for being white, she'll fall back on "muh anti-Semitism!". This fundamentally transforms her anti-white posturing from brainwashed suicidal idiocy into a deceptive and malicious attack on an outgroup. And that outgroup is growing tired of the act.
You will never convince people to ignore this shit once they've seen it. If you're worried about the implications for Jewish people, go ahead and explain to them that this duplicity is going to bite them in the ass eventually - for the 100th plus time, give or take, right? I mean we're happy to point out that Muslims seem incapable of coexisting with any other religion, but I can think of some other demographics that fall into that category as well. We're just not allowed to talk about them.
Yeah, I doubt that a woman who supports Farrakhan is going to whine about anti-Semitism because of completely legitimate criticism of being anti-white.
This is the best way that 'your side' has argued for this, and it speaks volumes that I have never seen one of you formulate it this intelligently and properly. I suggest you frame your criticism like this, instead of making it about Jew vs. non-Jew. It is completely legitimate, when a Jew who does not consider himself white attacks white people, to point out that he is attacking an outgroup.
For most of these Jews, this will not be applicable, as they consider themselves white and their comments are of the same nature as the loser white kneelers. A lot of these Jews even claim that white Jews have 'white privilege' - apparently that of having your family members be gassed.
I'm not at all concerned about the Chelsea Handlers of the world. I'm concerned about the many good Jews in the world, about whom the Chelsea Handlers and the Rothschilds of the world couldn't give a damn, because they are self-serving elites.
And here's where you lose all credibility again. You let your rage at this group overtake your good sense. Even if you do hate them, if you want to be taken seriously, you have to frame your arguments in such a way that does not make it absolutely obvious that you have a bizarre, setting hatred for you.
Chelsea Handler's religion is Social Justice, not Judaism.
Uhhh, have you considered that maybe he doesn't hate all jews? This really is revealing of your own mindset in that you equate 'noticing' to indiscriminate hate.
Quite unlikely, because if he feels the need to bring attention to the fact that people he does not like are Jews, while not similarly feeling the need to bring attention to the fact that decent people are Jews, then this suggests what his motivations are.
It's in scare quotes for a reason. These people aren't 'noticing' squat, but rather, engaging in their ample confirmation bias.
This is the same argument I keep having with Auron over on GGdiscussion. The issue isn't with Jews, per se. The issue is their disproportionate representation among blue checks, academics and media figures with any clout pushing their anti white narrative. The other issue is that people go into defcon 5 when people point out the pattern, which makes the whole thing look really suspicious.
This is one reason why I like Dave Smith, he's a Jewish guy that has pointed this thing out and even agrees that there is an issue here. Being able to point this out is step one toward being able to address the narrative in any meaningful way.
You've turned confirmation bias into a meme in order to prevent pattern recognition.
Or more likely you are the only retard here who thinks that they are Jews. Or that Tracy Hickman is a woman for that matter. Get out glowie, you are not one of us.
*chef's kiss*