You know damn well why it matters that she’s Jewish: the moment someone tries to tear her down for being white, she'll fall back on "muh anti-Semitism!".
Yeah, I doubt that a woman who supports Farrakhan is going to whine about anti-Semitism because of completely legitimate criticism of being anti-white.
This fundamentally transforms her anti-white posturing from brainwashed suicidal idiocy into a deceptive and malicious attack on an outgroup.
This is the best way that 'your side' has argued for this, and it speaks volumes that I have never seen one of you formulate it this intelligently and properly. I suggest you frame your criticism like this, instead of making it about Jew vs. non-Jew. It is completely legitimate, when a Jew who does not consider himself white attacks white people, to point out that he is attacking an outgroup.
For most of these Jews, this will not be applicable, as they consider themselves white and their comments are of the same nature as the loser white kneelers. A lot of these Jews even claim that white Jews have 'white privilege' - apparently that of having your family members be gassed.
If you're worried about the implications for Jewish people, go ahead and explain to them
I'm not at all concerned about the Chelsea Handlers of the world. I'm concerned about the many good Jews in the world, about whom the Chelsea Handlers and the Rothschilds of the world couldn't give a damn, because they are self-serving elites.
for the 100th plus time, give or take
And here's where you lose all credibility again. You let your rage at this group overtake your good sense. Even if you do hate them, if you want to be taken seriously, you have to frame your arguments in such a way that does not make it absolutely obvious that you have a bizarre, setting hatred for you.
I mean we're happy to point out that Muslims seem incapable of coexisting with any other religion, but I can think of some other demographics that fall into that category as well. We're just not allowed to talk about them.
Chelsea Handler's religion is Social Justice, not Judaism.
Yeah, I doubt that a woman who supports Farrakhan is going to whine about anti-Semitism because of completely legitimate criticism of being anti-white.
This is the best way that 'your side' has argued for this, and it speaks volumes that I have never seen one of you formulate it this intelligently and properly. I suggest you frame your criticism like this, instead of making it about Jew vs. non-Jew. It is completely legitimate, when a Jew who does not consider himself white attacks white people, to point out that he is attacking an outgroup.
For most of these Jews, this will not be applicable, as they consider themselves white and their comments are of the same nature as the loser white kneelers. A lot of these Jews even claim that white Jews have 'white privilege' - apparently that of having your family members be gassed.
I'm not at all concerned about the Chelsea Handlers of the world. I'm concerned about the many good Jews in the world, about whom the Chelsea Handlers and the Rothschilds of the world couldn't give a damn, because they are self-serving elites.
And here's where you lose all credibility again. You let your rage at this group overtake your good sense. Even if you do hate them, if you want to be taken seriously, you have to frame your arguments in such a way that does not make it absolutely obvious that you have a bizarre, setting hatred for you.
Chelsea Handler's religion is Social Justice, not Judaism.