20
YesMovement 20 points ago +20 / -0

"You have the human right to be forced to do X!" - Comrade Derpy

Ummmmm, no. And you don't have the human right to force people to attend your freakshow, or even a non-freak show

23
YesMovement 23 points ago +24 / -1

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith did, too, and her office provided a similar response when a photo of the premier with the same individual began circulating online. Sam Blackett, a press secretary for Smith, said in a statement that the premier also did not read the person’s shirt, “and obviously doesn’t agree with its message.” Blackett added Smith has “always been clear” that she supports those in the LGBTQ community.

Cuckservatives in Canada act like Smith & PP are these "real true blue conservatives" when they support unrestricted abortion, child drag shows & gay pride.

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

The general rule for domestic box office is double the production budget to find the break even point. But international box office shares are different which is why the breakdown matters.

https://deadline.com/2023/05/little-mermaid-box-office-profit-loss-halle-bailey-1235383099

In a rare situation for a Disney tentpole, particularly a live-action title based on a treasured classic animated musical, The Little Mermaid looks to bank more at the domestic box office ultimately than overseas, with $300M-$350M U.S./Canada to $260M abroad.

At that level, per finance sources, off a reported $250M production cost and $140M global marketing spend, The Little Mermaid could very well break-even. However, anything in the low $400M global threshold and this fish is apt to be sinking to a loss of around $20M.

In a break-even scenario off a $560M global box office (meaning a net profit of $71M before participations and residuals are accounted for), we’re told that Little Mermaid‘s global film revenues would amount to $547M against its combined production, global theatrical and home entertainment marketing expenses of $476M. The pic’s revenues broken down include $267M in global theatrical film rentals, $100M net in domestic pay/free TV and what Disney pays itself to put the movie on Disney+, $100M in global home entertainment (DVD, digital), and $80M in international TV and streaming.

7
YesMovement 7 points ago +7 / -0

But I thought the media narrative was his temperament was the was the kind, polite grandpa whose calm demeanor would bring normalcy, sanity & decency back to the Oval Office???

-8
YesMovement -8 points ago +1 / -9

He's not based, quite the opposite- he's weak & insecure.

He found a hot woman on Instagram & liked her bikini pics but is worried if other guys see them he'll slide into her DMs like he did and take her from him.

He's not trying to protect her modesty, he knows she can easily find guys way better.

9
YesMovement 9 points ago +9 / -0

Remember that while 14 yr olds can consent to puberty blockers and double mastectomies, 22 yr olds simply lack the maturity & can't consent to dating a 48 yr old.

-8
YesMovement -8 points ago +1 / -9

Trying to control a woman's source of income (by removing half the population as potential clients) is abusive, yes. Saying she can't post pics in a bathing suit to her Insta (I don't think the thong thing is as bad) is controlling & thus abusive, yes.

But definitely pathetic he doesn't trust her around other men.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +9 / -8

He knew from the beginning she was a surf instructor and posted swimsuit pics on her IG when he met her. If he had said at the beginning "I would like to date you but I have some issues with some things you're currently doing that would need to change." then IMO that's fine- she can decide if she's willing to stop doing that before agreeing to date.

But it seems he appears to have brought these "boundaries", including excluding half the population as her business clientele, midway into the relationship to be rather sus- plus I'm predisposed not to believe Hill in the 1st place.

Still it's not like they were married/had kids/etc (were they even living together?) so if he decided, honestly or not, to bring "no pictures of yourself in a bathing suit" and other rules in there's nothing really stopping her from saying no and telling him to either accept that or they'd part ways.

I could see this very easily as him being abusive- he was cool with her doing all that before he hooked her then Mr Woke Liberal suddenly decides a woman posting thong pics is unacceptable? Plus some of his demands like "no modelling", "no bathing suit (not even just bikini) pics" & "no surfing with men" are controlling & unhealthy- it would be on par for abusers to mix it in with more reasonable requests like "no posting sexual pictures", "inappropriate friendships with men" (assuming what he means by "inappropriate" is reasonable) and concern about hanging out with people in bad places.

4
YesMovement 4 points ago +4 / -0

The feminists are accusing him of abusive behaviors while others are defending Hill of just communicating his boundaries. Is he being genuine or gaslighting w/ "I am not the right partner for you. If these things bring you to a place of happiness I support it and there will be no hard feelings."?

5
YesMovement 5 points ago +5 / -0

Me neither. Nitter isn't functioning yet either although instead of saying it can't find the user it brings up the account w/ no or just the pinned tweet.

Although I discovered if you have a suspended account you can still view Twitter

7
YesMovement 7 points ago +7 / -0

FUN FACT: The Guardian ran a huge exposé on child sex trafficking in Columbia in 2018

Now they are saying it's a conspiracy theory to watch a movie about child sex trafficking set in Columbia

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1677297575227973632

41
YesMovement 41 points ago +41 / -0

Opposing human trafficking is now far right.

Our old pals at Jezebel also agree with that statement - "‘Sound of Freedom’ Is an Anti-Child Trafficking Fantasy Fit for QAnon": https://archive.is/bkkEr

6
YesMovement 6 points ago +6 / -0

She was literally a Mohawk grandmother on a mobility scooter.

There was also a guy (who I believe was white) holding a bike they trampled as well, they tried to spin it as the disabled grandma's bike which was (in this totally made-up story) thrown at the poor, defenseless, innocent police officers who had no choice but to trample them in self-defense.

They literally turned the white cops into the Breonna Taylor's boyfriend/Nahel Merzouk (the Algerian migrant in France)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›