other people's sex lives
INCEL!! HE'S AN INCEL!!! INCELS ARE BAD BECAUSE THEIR SEX LIVES AREN'T THE WAY I WANT!!!!!!!
Who could possibly be so stupid and clueless?
By AMANDA MARCOTTE
Oh...
After Trump won (or maybe it was more after he lost) they went not full TDS but definitely worse
She has nice knockers!
Just watched it- SPOILER:
Kathleen Kennedy used "the Panderstone" to make all the woke remakes & everything based on multiverses. This caused a rip in the multiverse so another universe's KK who is basically Cartman replaces her and is the one making post-Indiana Jones Disney so awful as her solution for everything is "put a chick in it and maker her gay and lame".
In the end our universe's KK says just wanted to fight racism & she pandered so hard because of all the hate mail calling her a cunt (all written by Cartman) and Cartman apologies and said they're both to blame and mocking woke stuff is as unoriginal as making woke stuff.
This is of course nonsensical because there has to be one that came first, and clearly people couldn't complain about woke stuff without the stuff being make woke in the 1st place. This is the "muh both sides" shit OP was talking about, and I completely agree.
Some of those may not actually be wokeness, proper names on UD are full of people writing BS about themselves or their SOs ie "Betty is the prettiest, most awesome girlfriend in the universe!"
Simonsen is a Scandinavian name, dumbass. It's one of the most common Danish surnames: https://www.thoughtco.com/most-common-danish-last-names-meanings-1422650
The students who said simply that they “support all forms of Palestinian resistance”? I see no support for the heinous crimes you list out.
What do you think "all" means? Some?? They saw "Palestinian resistance" kill >1400 civilians including babies, kidnap & rape women, they see them holding 200 hostages and instead of condemning what they already did they outright said they not only support that but anything else they decide to do.
All means all, ar-tard.
How am I a "Zionist" (as if that has to be a bad thing) for thinking being pro-terrorist should stop you from being a lawyer? That there should be any consequences for what you say?
So why? Why contort yourself into a pretzel (“cancel culture is sometimes a good thing!”) for a group of people who, if you weren’t lying the last time I asked, think of you as a subhuman fit for no more than servitude at their feet?
I don't believe actions should have consequences because of the Jooooooos, I'm not a Jew-hater so I spend most of my life not thinking or giving a shit about Jews. There's no contortion required- saying biological sex is real should get you cancelled, saying all Jews are just targets for the alleged crimes of Israel by terrorist should. I explicitly said criticizing Israel, even if those criticisms are absurd bullshit, shouldn't stop you from becoming a lawyer.
Remember when you accused the mayor of Edmonton of showing the “colors of hamas” when it was actually the flag of 2.5 million Palestinians?
Have the "Palestinians" kicked out Hamas or even vote them out of power? The last polls showed >70% support for Hamas. "Palestine" is code for Hamas for 90% of the people who use the term.
They said they support any Palestinian tactic of resistance and liberation. That could include killing babies
Not could, does. "All forms" is actually quite clear- they mean zero restrictions whatsoever. All means all and it's intentionally dishonest to act as if that means otherwise.
Please don't be mean to people who support raping women and killing children or you're a zionist
This is your brain on anti-Semitism folks
Yes, if their opinions are truly awful like supporting terrorist attacks on children.
Nobody has ever said there should never be any consequences for anything anyone ever says.
Cancel culture refers to going after people for saying things either innocuous (whether by the words themselves, or by the age of who said it or length of time since they said them) or true.
Criticizing Israel (whether legit or not) would be acceptable for law students, supporting adults having sex with children would not.
CBC actually has a half-decent article about this: https://archive.ph/bFbOy
Both DeLorey and Marland said there's a lesson there for journalists. DeLorey said the whole scene could have gone down differently if the reporter had asked different questions or cited specific examples.
That's buried at the very end, but the fact it's even in there is a rare win by CBC standards.
draw conclusions based on insufficient evidence
-
Find headless babies
-
???
-
maliciously draw conclusion that someone beheaded them
-
"Could have been the wind!"
That's a bit of an overstatement, don't you think?
Maybe those babies decided they didn't want to wait for their necks to develop and chose to take their own heads off.
You don't have video of anyone beheading them, it could be anything- maybe it was climate change or because the babies weren't vaccinated against covid?
https://twitter.com/bcbluecon/status/1715894606699835628
Instead of asking Poilievre about Okanagan issues the local reporter decided to ask about Trump and populism. All without a clue what either question even meant.
https://twitter.com/ThePosieParker/status/1716030630469739006
I’ve been interview under caution about tweets opposing castrating children, using the word lesbian, calling Susie Green a children’s champion and showing her photo. I’ve had police at my door for being “untoward about paedophiles” and been arrested for trying to talk outside on public during the lockdown….
Related: https://twitter.com/TPointUK/status/1716025663558156755
The @metpoliceuk threaten two Londoners with arrest for holding up the flag of their country at a Palestine March, baselessly suggesting they may be racist. Meanwhile they allow the pro-Palestine mob to call for jihad and engage in widespread violence. This is the definition of two-tier policing.
https://twitter.com/Sargon_of_Akkad/status/1716036139197345994
For the Met, racism is the ultimate crime, whereas jihad is just a normal feature of political life.
I wonder if he ever showed this much restraint reaching conclusions when it comes to statements/policies of Donald Trump, or the motive and actions of J6ers?
On what planet is sex something to hide from children? Let's have anal sex trivia at football games because they need to learn from it!
You wouldn't teach a 4 yr old about the Holocaust any more than you'd teach a 4 yr old about anal sex because it's not age appropriate. And there are serious topics taught in a classroom you don't show on the fucking Jumbotron.
Hitler is more than just "an historical figure", if you can't see that you're either retarded or something far worse...
Oh you're retarded, aren't you?
I never said "a picture of hitler is an endorsement of his actions", just that it was inappropriate at a fucking football game- something every non-retard agrees on.
And there's lots of world history that isn't about genocidal maniacs they could have used. Are you so internet-brained you can't see the obvious problem with this?
If you can't see why giant photos of Hitler at sporting events is bad, especially <2 weeks after the biggest slaughter of Jews since him, I don't think I can help you.
There are kids who come to these games, why are you people having so much trouble thinking we shouldn't be putting Pol Pot pics at a Saturday afternoon college football game???
Like Jesus you guys, go outside and touch some grass- this is a very sane thing to be offended by. It is possible for normal, reasonable people to be offended by normal, reasonable things.
Hitler is not "generic" trivia. "Which Friends alum starred in films with Bruce Willis?" is generic trivia, not "This failed children's entertainer murdered over 30 teenage boys and buried them in his crawl space. Can you name this "Killer Clown"?"
For those wondering about the event he's talking about https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1718697220516536694
Of course he leaves out the "Allahu Akbar" part...