I actually support this, and not because JEWS BAD. 'Journalists' all too often maliciously draw conclusions based on insufficient evidence. When you find headless babies, it is certainly a reasonable assumption that they were beheaded by Hamas, but that is taking it beyond the evidence.
I try to think of all possibilities, no matter how remote they are. For example, if Ukrainians found dead headless babies, my conclusion wouldn't immediately be that Russher did it.
Of course, Hamas is sui generis when it comes to evil, so I do consider it highly likely that they did it - but still I don't want 'journalists' to do my thinking for me.
I actually support this, and not because JEWS BAD. 'Journalists' all too often maliciously draw conclusions based on insufficient evidence. When you find headless babies, it is certainly a reasonable assumption that they were beheaded by Hamas, but that is taking it beyond the evidence.
Separation of fact and inference.
Find headless babies
???
maliciously draw conclusion that someone beheaded them
"Could have been the wind!"
I try to think of all possibilities, no matter how remote they are. For example, if Ukrainians found dead headless babies, my conclusion wouldn't immediately be that Russher did it.
Of course, Hamas is sui generis when it comes to evil, so I do consider it highly likely that they did it - but still I don't want 'journalists' to do my thinking for me.