Yes, if their opinions are truly awful like supporting terrorist attacks on children.
Nobody has ever said there should never be any consequences for anything anyone ever says.
Cancel culture refers to going after people for saying things either innocuous (whether by the words themselves, or by the age of who said it or length of time since they said them) or true.
Criticizing Israel (whether legit or not) would be acceptable for law students, supporting adults having sex with children would not.
Yes, if their opinions are truly awful like supporting terrorist attacks on children.
The problem here is that the students' statement is (intentionally) non-specific. Accusations like this will be treated as putting words in their mouths.
They said they support any Palestinian tactic of resistance and liberation. That could include killing babies, but that sounds mean, so the good Palestinians probably wouldn't do that.
Unless Hamas/Palestine clearly declared the intent of the surprise attack, we totes can't just assume that it was for freedom, bro.
They said they support any Palestinian tactic of resistance and liberation. That could include killing babies
Not could, does. "All forms" is actually quite clear- they mean zero restrictions whatsoever. All means all and it's intentionally dishonest to act as if that means otherwise.
Who, exactly, are you accusing of that crime which sounds so absurdly horrible as to be worthy of death in any good society?
The law society who refused to comment?
The students who said simply that they “support all forms of Palestinian resistance”?
I see no support for the heinous crimes you list out. I’m sure when asked 100% would say you’re being dishonest in how you characterize them.
So why? Why contort yourself into a pretzel (“cancel culture is sometimes a good thing!”) for a group of people who, if you weren’t lying the last time I asked, think of you as a subhuman fit for no more than servitude at their feet? That’s the zionists I’m talking about there, before you shit yourself in an attempt to avoid the point, not all of world jewry.
Its almost like you’re full of shit yet again, just like you are on all of these topics (roughly 5 every single day {except Friday and Saturday?} of just pure zionist felation? That’s odd).
Remember when you accused the mayor of Edmonton of showing the “colors of hamas” when it was actually the flag of 2.5 million Palestinians? Lol
The students who said simply that they “support all forms of Palestinian resistance”? I see no support for the heinous crimes you list out.
What do you think "all" means? Some?? They saw "Palestinian resistance" kill >1400 civilians including babies, kidnap & rape women, they see them holding 200 hostages and instead of condemning what they already did they outright said they not only support that but anything else they decide to do.
All means all, ar-tard.
How am I a "Zionist" (as if that has to be a bad thing) for thinking being pro-terrorist should stop you from being a lawyer? That there should be any consequences for what you say?
So why? Why contort yourself into a pretzel (“cancel culture is sometimes a good thing!”) for a group of people who, if you weren’t lying the last time I asked, think of you as a subhuman fit for no more than servitude at their feet?
I don't believe actions should have consequences because of the Jooooooos, I'm not a Jew-hater so I spend most of my life not thinking or giving a shit about Jews. There's no contortion required- saying biological sex is real should get you cancelled, saying all Jews are just targets for the alleged crimes of Israel by terrorist should. I explicitly said criticizing Israel, even if those criticisms are absurd bullshit, shouldn't stop you from becoming a lawyer.
Remember when you accused the mayor of Edmonton of showing the “colors of hamas” when it was actually the flag of 2.5 million Palestinians?
Have the "Palestinians" kicked out Hamas or even vote them out of power? The last polls showed >70% support for Hamas. "Palestine" is code for Hamas for 90% of the people who use the term.
Yes, if their opinions are truly awful like supporting terrorist attacks on children.
Nobody has ever said there should never be any consequences for anything anyone ever says.
Cancel culture refers to going after people for saying things either innocuous (whether by the words themselves, or by the age of who said it or length of time since they said them) or true.
Criticizing Israel (whether legit or not) would be acceptable for law students, supporting adults having sex with children would not.
The problem here is that the students' statement is (intentionally) non-specific. Accusations like this will be treated as putting words in their mouths.
They said they support any Palestinian tactic of resistance and liberation. That could include killing babies, but that sounds mean, so the good Palestinians probably wouldn't do that.
Unless Hamas/Palestine clearly declared the intent of the surprise attack, we totes can't just assume that it was for freedom, bro.
Not could, does. "All forms" is actually quite clear- they mean zero restrictions whatsoever. All means all and it's intentionally dishonest to act as if that means otherwise.
This is your brain on zionism folks
This is your brain on anti-Semitism folks
Who, exactly, are you accusing of that crime which sounds so absurdly horrible as to be worthy of death in any good society?
The law society who refused to comment?
The students who said simply that they “support all forms of Palestinian resistance”?
I see no support for the heinous crimes you list out. I’m sure when asked 100% would say you’re being dishonest in how you characterize them.
So why? Why contort yourself into a pretzel (“cancel culture is sometimes a good thing!”) for a group of people who, if you weren’t lying the last time I asked, think of you as a subhuman fit for no more than servitude at their feet? That’s the zionists I’m talking about there, before you shit yourself in an attempt to avoid the point, not all of world jewry.
Its almost like you’re full of shit yet again, just like you are on all of these topics (roughly 5 every single day {except Friday and Saturday?} of just pure zionist felation? That’s odd).
Remember when you accused the mayor of Edmonton of showing the “colors of hamas” when it was actually the flag of 2.5 million Palestinians? Lol
What do you think "all" means? Some?? They saw "Palestinian resistance" kill >1400 civilians including babies, kidnap & rape women, they see them holding 200 hostages and instead of condemning what they already did they outright said they not only support that but anything else they decide to do.
All means all, ar-tard.
How am I a "Zionist" (as if that has to be a bad thing) for thinking being pro-terrorist should stop you from being a lawyer? That there should be any consequences for what you say?
I don't believe actions should have consequences because of the Jooooooos, I'm not a Jew-hater so I spend most of my life not thinking or giving a shit about Jews. There's no contortion required- saying biological sex is real should get you cancelled, saying all Jews are just targets for the alleged crimes of Israel by terrorist should. I explicitly said criticizing Israel, even if those criticisms are absurd bullshit, shouldn't stop you from becoming a lawyer.
Have the "Palestinians" kicked out Hamas or even vote them out of power? The last polls showed >70% support for Hamas. "Palestine" is code for Hamas for 90% of the people who use the term.