-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +6 / -14

There are so many things hurting and really killing our kids

And most of them are related to women. Who will it be, Charlize? Will you tell the truth and attack the sisterhood? Or let them destroy your supposed allies in the rainbow coalition?

-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +2 / -15

I don't think anyone truly cares, it's just an attempt to make us white knight for the sisterhood.

Earnings will prove it. Women can fight their own battles, nobody wants to be their ally.

-16
TheImpossible1 -16 points ago +2 / -18

bud light

Put money on this - Anheuser-Busch will be unaffected in Q2.

I'm pretty sure the focus on that story is paid for by DeSimptis at this point. I haven't met anyone who cares.


The NFL boycott was over the kneeling in 2020. Clearly nobody had the spine to carry it on for more than a year.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

The KMT is going to win and women will cry when their stake in defense contractors falls harder in value than First Republic's market cap.

It is inevitable, hence their desperate attempts to stir up something.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

No, we should not. The current leader is almost guaranteed to lose the election with her handpicked successor, so it'd be a waste of money and risk wasting men's blood to prop up a feminist shithole.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

Rishi Sunak is potentially getting ousted over the local election results.

I knew that before it was ever announced, when Melinda Gates protégé Penny Mordaunt had a starring role at the coronation of the king.

Remember that name. The More Feminine Way is coming back to power, Rishi didn't destroy enough lives for their liking.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

I'm guessing ER stands for Elliot Rodger. This post is a clear attempt at a feminist false flag, but they couldn't resist using their buzzwords enough to make it stick.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +5 / -8

This post comes off as a feminist trying to sound like an incel, with the whole tongue-in-cheek praise of women, but it sounds too feminist. No anti-woman activist would ever use "toxic masculinity" unironically.

-22
TheImpossible1 -22 points ago +3 / -25

Why? Most feminist ideology is literally based off the ramblings of a convicted attempted murderer, Valerie Solanas. It's perfectly within logic for those who support it to emulate her.

Couple that with the bizarre crossover between far-right simps and violent fantasist pro-woman garbage, and I'm surprised this hasn't happened before.

It's funny that they blame "misogyny" though. Because those who hate women absolutely love far-right tradfaggots. Said nobody ever.

Every pro-woman shill should be put on a list before they kill people. The warped ideology and mindset you need to support women is a prime candidate for mass shooting attempts.

Three possible future mass shooters downvoted this.

Make that five.

Wow, ten. I hope that the downvoting soothes their anger enough for them to resist shooting up innocent people.

-19
TheImpossible1 -19 points ago +2 / -21

Ironic, because none of his supposed views make sense.

You can't be "misogynist" and a Nazi/White Nationalist because those people are pathetic simps who overvalue women.

You can't be pro-TERF and still be anti-woman because the premise of people like Libs of TikTok is that womanhood is something to be proud of (it isn't).

I think they're just trying to use the anti-woman narrative because Audrey Hale's manifesto is very, very bad news for women's societal position.

-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +4 / -17

Oh no, he's pro-TERF...another strike for the worse halves.

Prepare the incel narratives!

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +3 / -7

This one might stick.

We really need the feminist killer's manifesto, to put pressure back on women.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +6 / -6

no good solutions

Bribe men to enter teaching. Studies have shown men want to help boys, but know women's bias and hatred is too much of a risk to enter the sector.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +1 / -11

But then we'd be arguing what a position of power would be defined as and whether that person in that position isthe one actually holding the power.

I wouldn't consider Boris Johnson's leadership as a man in charge, considering the leaks that his wife directed policy. That's a good example.

I wouldn't believe Biden or any of his cabinet hold power after Politico's article about how Joe always asks Jill for the final say on anything.

What if someone is Jewish and female, like Janet Yellen, or the disaster Fed vice chair Lael Brainard?

There's more chance a woman's bias affects the average person.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +3 / -12

I don't have to. 51% of the population is a far larger problem than 2%.

There's also the fact that most people here will never even meet a Jewish person.

-11
TheImpossible1 -11 points ago +5 / -16

premarital sex

financial ruin

As opposed to getting married and getting the financial ruin, but no sex.

-16
TheImpossible1 -16 points ago +4 / -20

Defending marriage in this day and age is more ridiculous than being a Ukraine supporter.

-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +1 / -14

I mean, I'm not saying it's women's fault. I'm saying you people have bigger blinders than a horse running in the Kentucky Derby.

7
TheImpossible1 7 points ago +14 / -7

When you tell people who are fueled by Dunning-Kruger and malicious intentions to be your saviors...

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +2 / -6

They just believe in right-wing feminism.

  • "muh womanhood is sacred" - The near constant crying about trannies really boils down to white knighting for a perceived attack against women's status.

  • "marriage good" - I don't even need to explain this one.

  • "degeneracy" - "gays back in the closet", porn bans and other clear attempts to vilify being a man unwilling to marry. Demonization of homosexuals was used in Nazi Germany to dispose of single men who opposed the focus on women and marriage that government spending had. You don't have to be gay to be targeted under the label. The use of "incel" to describe anyone who opposes women should prove this.

  • "Male duty to fight for their women and their country" - The male disposability narrative is a key tradcon shitpost of an ideology, where women who will never fight a war vote for warmongers like Lindsay Graham. It's based off the idea that as a man, your "duty" is to protect everyone else's interests over your own.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›