It isn't controlled by trannies. Such a theory is fucking ridiculous. It's always been controlled by women, that's why you can't speak up against them and even places like MensRights have to include "not all women" disclaimers.
GenderCritical was banned because they were advocating violence and everyone, left and right, thought they would be the next group to commit a mass shooting.
If you look at their new site, you would see that the fears are justified. We haven't seen the last feminist lunatic "identifying as a man" to hide her true motives.
Okay.
TwoXChromosomes stickied a call for mass violence against men from a user who had threatened a mass shooting on men's communities.
When this happened, r/GenderCritical started the theory that the moderators were men acting to make women look bad.
This is clear BS, as feminist writings are filled with open calls for violence, from as far back as 1893 and likely further (even though we don't have evidence of these writings existing earlier than that).
They were not worried innocent people would be killed. They were worried that people would finally see the malevolence of the average woman and the dark desires of every feminist.
Nah, women only allow trannies to get power when they can use it to get the state to intervene to protect their status.
See also : Rob! 2024
Only if they get to divorce him for half his wealth after the war.
I think it should only be women. A country that serves the interests of a single group should be defended by it.
Meanwhile Trump 2024's Donald Jr. wanted to completely end the grassroots Budweiser boycott because Budweiser donated some money to Trump. It is clear who is beholden to donors.
Grassroots...right...Kering Foundation ally and pusher of gender quota ESG, BNP Paribas has millions of shares short against that and Target. Citadel has 1.9m puts against Target. UBS, Barclays and Bank of America are short Target.
Maybe being women's lapdog isn't a political strategy that President Trump is willing to do?
It's about as grassroots as DeSimptis himself.
Doesn't seem like it. Has he got any actual policy?
Calling everything a war on woke isn't real policy. What's his economic policy? Or have his donors not told him yet?
Seems like a flaw in strategy more than something that should be continued. If our position is that fragile, we should be reducing dependence, not entrenching it because of sunk cost fallacies.
I refer to him as DeSimptis because he is a simp who cares more about women's spaces than anything else.
Long live The Magadonians!
And yet Trump didn't start a war for them.
DeSimptis already said he wants to militarily counter the CCP in Taiwan.
Well, he can send the TERF scum to fight it.
We shouldn't die for a society that cares more about fucking rainbow flags than about crushing the systems holding us down. There is clear and obvious evidence that women are leading mass discrimination against men. The figures show it at every level.
And yet...all we hear about is women's spaces
Go fuck yourselves. Die in the fucking war your sisters are profiting off.
It's because they know that men will claim to be trans to avoid dying for Taiwan.
They are scum. I wonder how much Northrop funds this guy and DeSimptis.
I don't think they're scared of being doxxed. What repercussions will come? Will companies fire them for taking part in things like this? I doubt it
I literally have evidence for it.
And you won't admit that your ideology is the most feminist. You openly believe in female superiority. It's on video.
I mean, I'm not claiming it. I have evidence. There's a difference.
what side? what ideology?
I wonder what funny name I can call the mustache man followers.
You talk about feminism a lot but never want to talk about the biggest feminists
I really don't think a Hitler humper has much to say on this topic.
I still have the video that ConPro banned someone for sharing.
And the most matriarchal culture there is.
Again, I don't think the "men exist to die while women get medals for breeding" culture has much to say here.
So you've never heard the whole "feminism isn't a thing in Japan" thing? Or the constant promotion of their entertainment as non-woke?
It's a two-faced strategy. Project opposition to feminism while heavily funding it abroad.
Even if I did, your side would still bot me for stepping out of line with your ideology. I mean, I posted about the WEF and Gates, but it's against the whole "get the gays!" thing people here are on now, so we can't have that.
Why would I help you? It's also a lot more nuanced than that, a list doesn't communicate relevance.
Already been permanently banned once, but I've changed my ISP and don't have any of the same devices now.
I could probably get away without a ban if I just posted things and stayed away from making comments. My comments get me banned more than my posts, even here.
We only talk about women's issues now, don't you know?
I really can't win. I try to post about what we used to stand for, I get botted. I post about what I usually do, I get botted.
Only way to win is to sacrifice my principles for upvotes like a fucking Redditor. Actually, I think I'd do better on r/KiA2. Mostly because the stormfags are all banned.
Would be better to not hire them if that was the case.
I just think it's extremely suspicious that they project an image of being above women's hatred, but in reality are hugely invested in protecting it.
Clearly not enough, because there are still people who think women were good people in the past.
I don't know what happened to this place while I was gone though. Seems like you've all swallowed the same Kool-aid as the DeSimps.
I'm working on a long post about it. Not sure where I'll post it. Feels like this place has turned against me. It's weird, because every event is proving me more right.
TL;DR, they shove all their feminists into the US branches of their financial institutions, and then those institutions push targeted ESG against male hiring.
The key point of the whole "women's spaces" debate is pretending women can't be pedophiles, that men are a unique threat to kids.
It's an argument straight from women's bile-filled propaganda - who called them pedophiles when they invaded the Boy Scouts? NOBODY!
There shouldn't be women's spaces. There is no first amendment right to single gender spaces. That's what was ruled against men, and that's what should be ruled against women.
If the space can't exist with letting men in, cut it off from public funds.
You don't win by helping your enemy. You win by exploiting the gaps in their armor to crush them.
Because the hellspawn want to control the GOP. It's an election season and their man is DeSimptis. This is the exact same strategy they employed in the UK, except the fake issue that time was "domestic abuse rises".
They want to play victim and activate the tradcucks stuck in the past.
We lead by 42%. We need to stay ahead of their attacks. Deport ConPro now.