Archive Link to the quoted article
DeSantis cannot win the nomination on issues of economic policy. It is the economic policy that impacts the Billionaire Wall Street donors and multinationals. The donors are paying for an economic control outcome. That is why we are seeing such an emphasis on cultural issues from the Sea Island strategy, as displayed in the policy emphasis of Ron DeSantis.
cough "Protecting women" cough
Elon > World Economic Forum (Yaccarino) > Tulsi Gabbard > DeSimptis > Babylon Bee > Libs of TikTok > "defend women" agenda < Matt Walsh < Daily Wire
Citadel Securities (Ken Griffin) is likely who is pushing Target and Anheuser-Busch shares down, he is a major backer of DeSimptis and opens huge short positions frequently.
I think I worked it out.
The DeSimptis campaign was first being built when WEF member Tulsi Gabbard pushed "save women's sports" for the first time.
DeSimptis quickly made this his entire post-pandemic platform.
Elon bought Twitter to promote DeSimptis - that's why Trump never moved from Truth Social.
The reason there wasn't much legal scrutiny and a lot of media hitpieces was to serve the agenda of making him look targeted, like President Trump is.
From there, Elon opened the floodgates for the TERFs to come in and prop up the DeSimp agenda.
The timeline gets a little fuzzy here because I can't remember when this happened, but remember when Libs of TikTok got doxxed? Who took her under their wing? The Babylon Bee, now a paid-up DeSimptis ally.
The Daily Wire was always NeverTrump, yet they're all eating up Matt Walsh's clear push to make DeSimptis look like the man for the job. Has he committed to supporting President Trump over the establishment?
Getting back to the WEF, and the TERFs, Linda Yaccarino links those two groups to Elon, giving a direct line of communication between the WEF, Elon and TERF ideology when she becomes the new CEO of Twitter. Yaccarino is WEF chair for the Future of Work, and board member of a feminist organization.
But how can you really "prove" that the DeSimp agenda is winning? Fake boycotts, driven by Murdoch media and backed by Ken Griffin's short interest in the targets to make it look like they're falling organically.
The agenda is obvious - to hit President Trump for being too liberal.
The key point of the whole "women's spaces" debate is pretending women can't be pedophiles, that men are a unique threat to kids.
It's an argument straight from women's bile-filled propaganda - who called them pedophiles when they invaded the Boy Scouts? NOBODY!
There shouldn't be women's spaces. There is no first amendment right to single gender spaces. That's what was ruled against men, and that's what should be ruled against women.
If the space can't exist with letting men in, cut it off from public funds.
You don't win by helping your enemy. You win by exploiting the gaps in their armor to crush them.
That isn't the point of that discussion at all.
Male perverts can inflict violent rape more easily, rather than coercive rape as women are more prone to do. The former is a short term threat and the solution is preventative.
Hence segregated bathrooms.
The solution to female pedophilia is different, namely stripping them of authority over men. Or of anything besides their own blood children for that matter.
Approaching this from a civil rights perspective is absolutely foolish. Both from knowing your audience and from the point of view of actionable solutions.
This is a far right forum, despite that faggot Antonio's best efforts. As far as we're concerned democracy is a lie and civil rights are a joke, so you're selling to the wrong crowd. And secondly you aren't going to get proper reforms, let alone moral governance, from the courts. Not unless you have a time machine and can go back and murder John Marshall anyway.