Archive Link to the quoted article
DeSantis cannot win the nomination on issues of economic policy. It is the economic policy that impacts the Billionaire Wall Street donors and multinationals. The donors are paying for an economic control outcome. That is why we are seeing such an emphasis on cultural issues from the Sea Island strategy, as displayed in the policy emphasis of Ron DeSantis.
cough "Protecting women" cough
Elon > World Economic Forum (Yaccarino) > Tulsi Gabbard > DeSimptis > Babylon Bee > Libs of TikTok > "defend women" agenda < Matt Walsh < Daily Wire
Citadel Securities (Ken Griffin) is likely who is pushing Target and Anheuser-Busch shares down, he is a major backer of DeSimptis and opens huge short positions frequently.
I think I worked it out.
The DeSimptis campaign was first being built when WEF member Tulsi Gabbard pushed "save women's sports" for the first time.
DeSimptis quickly made this his entire post-pandemic platform.
Elon bought Twitter to promote DeSimptis - that's why Trump never moved from Truth Social.
The reason there wasn't much legal scrutiny and a lot of media hitpieces was to serve the agenda of making him look targeted, like President Trump is.
From there, Elon opened the floodgates for the TERFs to come in and prop up the DeSimp agenda.
The timeline gets a little fuzzy here because I can't remember when this happened, but remember when Libs of TikTok got doxxed? Who took her under their wing? The Babylon Bee, now a paid-up DeSimptis ally.
The Daily Wire was always NeverTrump, yet they're all eating up Matt Walsh's clear push to make DeSimptis look like the man for the job. Has he committed to supporting President Trump over the establishment?
Getting back to the WEF, and the TERFs, Linda Yaccarino links those two groups to Elon, giving a direct line of communication between the WEF, Elon and TERF ideology when she becomes the new CEO of Twitter. Yaccarino is WEF chair for the Future of Work, and board member of a feminist organization.
But how can you really "prove" that the DeSimp agenda is winning? Fake boycotts, driven by Murdoch media and backed by Ken Griffin's short interest in the targets to make it look like they're falling organically.
The agenda is obvious - to hit President Trump for being too liberal.
If you think that it's "sudden" that people are opposed to perverts, then imo it just shows that you still only have a eurocuck's view of this country and our history. Ironically proving exactly why immigration must be strictly curtailed and foreigners expelled.
Personal attacks don't answer my valid question.
Why was a WEF member leading the push to "protect women's sports".
Why is WEF Global Leader Yaccarino also a big supporter of that crap?
Why is DeSimptis backed by all the neocons? Why won't he tell anyone his policy plans?
Because his whole plan is to hit Trump for not being right-wing enough socially, disregarding that the issues we face today have nothing to do with a lack of retarded tradcons.
I would argue that the complicity of tradcons with feminism is why we ended up here. It was the Satanic Panic that finally shifted the balance of education heavily in women's favor.
Keep tilting at rainbow flags while women steal your jobs, your tax dollars and your right to live.
The secondary objective of this is to try and make ESG a "gay issue", so that nobody digs into the web of corruption that women have built around hiring with ESG bonds.
Is it any coincidence that this narrative magically appeared the moment people started to think "there's something going on in the schools"? Why are all the leaders of this narrative women or their supporters?
You contradict your thesis here. Is it "sudden" that the right opposes perverts or not?
Your original claim is that it wasn't, I point out that the right has always opposed perverts, and... then you regurgitate a largely fictional event espoused by leftists as propaganda.
Get some consistency man.
Trump literally waved a rainbow flag in 2016. We also had Grenell and Presler as prominent right-wing speakers.
What has the fake outrage about gays got us? DeSimps like Riley Gaines, SCUM Manifesto fangirls like Reduxx and JK Rowling and the most woman-centric GOP platform in decades.
Yes and he was wrong to do so. We've discussed this before, the man's greatest flaw is his magnanimity, he wants to be liked. He hasn't ever had a child molested by one of those freaks.
It's not fake outrage. They're hated because they deserve to be.
So it's just a coincidence that when people started to whisper "women are behind this, the schools are to blame", a massive agenda appeared out of nowhere?
You know, if Israel was criticized like that and something appeared to take all the attention away from it, I imagine you'd be here all the time begging people not to fall for the fake agenda.
Am I right in thinking that?
It was the moment when people were starting to say "there's something going on in the schools" that an overly female cohort pushed that we had to go after the gays and pushed to elect the most obvious political puppet of feminism I've seen. Weirdly, "there's something going on in the schools" was also the last idea Andrew Tate said before being arrested.
The schools are to blame. But it wasn't women who created public schools. Far from it.
It doesn't matter who created schools, it's who's running them.
Even if you don't believe there's something wrong with women as a whole, it's predominantly left-wing women that want to be teachers, and I'm sure that isn't because they love children.
I'd like to think we can agree that they take these roles to harm the boys and elevate the girls?
Imagine not being utterly disgusted by the thought of deepthroating a cock or licking an asshole. Imagine not being disgusted by the reservoir of diseases and parasites that is LGBTQ2SIMAP+. Imagine being so tolerant of sodomites that you have to rationalize opposition to them as a secret conspiracy.
Imagine being TheImpossible1.
I hate the idea of marriage, it disgusts me to see men exploited like that, but people still shove that failed ideology down my throat and make me pay for it.
Some, like the DeSimps behind this "gays are bad" push, want to force men into it by closing out all other avenues. Soon, you will either be married, a "sodomite" or a "incel terrorist". I mean, you wouldn't want to have a falling birth rate, we have to discriminate against those groups that are destroying our society.
See, I'm not fucking stupid. I know why they're actually going after gays. It's a proxy for the big shift towards promoting the failed ideology of marriage because women have had enough of trying to enslave simps with consent and demand government force does it for them.
Imagine not being disgusted that women are the majority of single homeowners due to divorce, or that the richest women are all divorcees who did nothing of value to acquire that wealth. Imagine promoting the ideology with the second highest suicide rate after literal castration.
Imagine being so tolerant of women that as they tell you that they will push you out of work however they can, that while whistle blowers plead with society to pay attention to their malice, you still shill for them.
Nothing I said hasn't been documented.
You are getting wrapped around the axel here. As Kaarous discussed, many people have opposed the pedo agenda organically. DeSantis isn't manufacturing that. What he is doing is over-relying on opposition to it in lieu of emphasizing more substantive things.
The GOP's number one priority is avoiding re-igniting a Trump 2016 style movement based around limiting immigration and opposing devastating trade and interventionalist foreign policies. They want to rock that baby back to sleep. They are doing this by fighting battles that don't really threaten the overarching system, attacking only the most grotesque excesses of the left and as such are even allowed some "victories."
Get a job.
One that isn't being a shill for women.
You can tell you've hit something important when you get brigaded like this.
This post did better on TD. This place is just full of simps and tradfaggots with grudges.
What's your real account?
Maybe TD is a larger sub that is able to absorb and dilute your insanity to the point that it isn't so disruptive.
Dunno. I don't go there. Or ConPro. Or any of the other places you like to whine (like a woman) about.
Four decades ago, 85% of 25-year-old men were working full-time. In 2021, it was 71%. Financial independence among this group declined from 77% in 1980 to 64% in 2021.
ESG hiring quotas overwhelmingly are now about gender, not race, requiring reduction in male hires.
Nobody is allowed to bring any of this up without being hit by powerful feminist lobbying groups.
Women have directed everyone's attention away from their grooming of kids to be subservient to women, to tilting at rainbow flags.
Women have been proven to be grading boys down deliberately.
In Europe, where feminist power is entrenched, jobs are earmarked for women before even being offered. Even at the most high profile institutions.