-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +3 / -7

little boys are getting their organs mutilated too for the tranny craze

And the only attention the hellspawn give that is to call them all future rapists who wanted to sneak into women's changing rooms.

I wish women had a massive insecurity that we could all trigger en masse.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

So a large corporate signed financing deals for a fringe system. That makes sense to you?

-22
TheImpossible1 -22 points ago +3 / -25

Just casually admitting "Racial politics doesn't work". Next is "women's highest loyalty is to their fellow woman."

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +3 / -13

Black Jews...yes, of course.

-11
TheImpossible1 -11 points ago +8 / -19

Yes, another woman led movement dedicated to destroying men.

People should really pay more attention to me.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +4 / -9

I can see it now.

The left "compromises" on women's sports and gets Dear Colleague rules returned.

The ERA passes, codifying discrimination as something that only happens to women.

God help us, we have such a worthless, pathetic opposition party.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

Nobody knew who was killed.

We still don't have a motive but I know your side needs this to be "muh evil tranny who hated women" so you can file it with your incel shit and pretend that you're not the problem.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +2 / -7

They don't want us to know what she is.

The stated motive for hiding it, to protect trannies, doesn't make sense. Everyone knows she is one because women couldn't allow a female shooter story....

That's the truth. No report likely means she was born female, and never was anything else. Her transition was nothing more than a haircut and a pronoun change on LinkedIn.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +3 / -9

Typical of you to give this "women don't support this because they want to castrate little boys, they've just been tricked!" lie.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +2 / -8

Women rule the world and he crossed their line.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +6 / -16

Isn't this from Alexandra Kollontai's book?

Edit :

A great universal family of workers will develop, in which all the workers, men and women, will above all be comrades. This is what relations between men and women, in the communist society will be like.

Yep.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +5 / -7

lol, we propped up the biggest monopoly alive, just to piss off Tencent

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +3 / -13

Same author :

In a piece in the Washington Post arguing that marriage offers tangible benefits to men, W. Bradford Wilcox, director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, wrote: “Men who get married work harder and more strategically, and earn more money than their single peers from similar backgrounds. Marriage also transforms men’s social worlds; they spend less time with friends and more time with family; they also go to bars less and to church more. In the provocative words of Nobel Laureate George Akerlof, men ‘settle down when they get married; if they fail to get married, they fail to settle down.’”

Biggest load of tradcucked garbage I've ever read, honestly.

And it’s not just because high-achieving men are more likely to marry in the first place. Previous studies have shown that “when there is no longer a wife enhancing her husband’s productivity, the man’s on-the-job performance, and hence wages, will decline.”

That's a funny way to say "married men work extra hours to get away from the suffering."

One last point: The average age of marriage in America is still under 30 years old. If we’re expecting large bank accounts at 30, our expectations might be too high. So if you’re a woman looking to get married and are (understandably) concerned about finances, stop trying to judge whether the guy is economically attractive today and look instead at which guy is likely to get better-looking economically as he ages. Better yet, marry for love, not coin — and you’ll be happy you did.

I love that last line that completely undermines the point of the article and is clearly there for the same reason I have to say not all women. Optics.

This article is literally a DeSimp, who hunts down simps.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

Anybody who bitches about TERFs over just feminists as much as imp does is suspect.

Imagine believing the EasIer To OpPoSe MoVeMEnT will defeat your enemies for you

Same person. But yeah, the feminists will defeat the trannies for you. After all, everyone who allies with them is always treated with respect for their help.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +3 / -6

That's actually interesting. At least there's an explanation beyond "they're lying about her being trans" that can be considered.

-12
TheImpossible1 -12 points ago +1 / -13

tfw people can't understand that you let the easier to oppose movement win so you can defeat them and they'll defeat your enemy.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +1 / -10

Judicial Watch interview with Riley Gaines at CPAC 2023

Riley Gaines and Senator Rand Paul talk about women's sports

Don't talk shit. They elevated this random feminist cretin who lost at sports to borderline godhood. The only one who has shown some spine by not being dragged into this is President Trump.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

The article literally says the doctor runs financing through SoFi.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +1 / -11

Foot in the door.

Also, what's the difference between that and the extremely feminist reveal of The Mandalorian being a woman?

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +2 / -9

You know SoFi finances this crap...they have a 5.5bn market cap.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›