1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gaining control. MAGA was never about hating da Jooos. Everything can be discussed and has been since day 1, but since Voat closed those who want to shift every convo to that refuse to chill.

Admin's decision to give that crowd refuge here killed the site, all our best content creators left in disgust. Surely you can understand that those who embrace nazi ideology are a problem, on a platform created to elect DJT.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting theory. I'll watch the link, if only because I've never paid attention to Tim Pool. If you had to rate his idea here compared to the bulk of his work, what would you give it?

SPEZ: this video "features Blaire White." Hard pass. Explains why I've always ignored this faggot. Still interested in your stated idea, as well as the requested rating.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm guessing the site owners have to tow the line

That's not how anything works. Speculating and assuming you're right prevents learning. ALWAYS.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Am I to understand that 'The Donald' got a visit from 'teh fedz' for jew posts?

No

You could read the OP linked in this OP, but so far no one here has been able to comprehend it. Reading is hard, apparently.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

MAGA was never a white political movement. You may have sincerely tried to turn it into that. If so, you sincerely failed.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

New team took over

Didn't happen.

See above: speculating and assuming you're right ALWAYS prevents learning. (This is synonymous with lying)

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're speculating, and have convinced yourself you're right. That always prevents learning.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

While usually true, making every discussion about da Jooos simply isn't what that .win is for.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said criticism of Trump is fine, but criticism of jews is a "derangement" and won't be tolerated

He didn't say that.

Learn how to read.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

So why is disagreeing with Trump now, when he broke yet another promise by starting a pointless foreign war, suddenly grounds for excommunication?

It's not.

If you could read, that would be obvious to you.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

(You wrote the only worthwhile comment in the thread)

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Normal volume through the Strait: 20MM bbl / day.

Current volume: 7.5 or less.

You're talking about a 3 year project, assuming unlimited resources.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

If he/they could do all this, they would have long ago.

Counterpoint: this was expected on day 1. Being in no rush to get to this part was a strategic decision. Whether that was a good idea remains to be seen.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Things are not always as they appear."

You're a substantial step ahead of most, simply by recognizing that you don't understand this. You could learn. I could give you some good links to get started, but everything about the middle east is complicated and the process couldn't possibly be quick and easy.

Cliff notes version is nobody's in control, and this war is FAR bigger than just US vs Iran. Also, WWIII started many years ago, by any possible measure. It's still small in volume as these things go, fortunately.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Acts of war are not illegal. Maritime law is mostly not understood. Make no mistake, a blockade certainly is an act of war. This applies to US and Iran equally.

Notice that Iran is hypocritically complaining about US' blockade; they think only they can do that, apparently. This is a small part of why DJT was in no rush to start this part, which is still a questionable strategic decision.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›