For those who haven't seen it, here's the great follow up with James Keefe where Jordon threw a fit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5n7RRKgDog
Interesting to see the Pfizer director of research and development being caught saying: "Like, I had to get the vaccine otherwise I would have gotten fired, right?"
To clarify the title, when I said "Elon tweets concerning", I didn't mean his tweets were considered concerning, but instead meant he literally tweeted the word "concerning" about the FBI's comments/actions.
In other words, Elon is being based.
Wikipedia's list loses out on a few things. You can't easily sort all of them by most users (you can for specific years, but not as a whole). The data has too much whitespace between each entry, and there's no clear colour coding for unbanned users. That's what I hoped to rectify here!
Because she said that male victims of rape are not real victims.
She's an idiot then. Thing is, I'm not sure if it's warranted she should go in the table anyway, because she only had 60.6K subscribers. I'm in two minds whether to keep the "Picks from the rest" data in the final percentage result.
Largely meaningless, who cares for prominent people?
I partially agree, but unless I stick to a set amount, it's easy to bias the percentage as progress, when it may not be. By sticking with this lot, it's harder to cherry pick and thus bias the data.
I can update this table periodically as Elon starts to unban more and more people. 16.4% restoration so far. Obviously this ignores the countless unknowns that have been banned. Generally, only the famous people are in this one (sourced from Wiki's list here).
Greens are good! That means Elon is keeping to his promises. Pale red are neutral - Elon has yet to unban these.
But deep red is bad. This means Elon is being hypocritical. We want as few of these as possible.
One of the comments, upvoted to 131 (13 downvotes):
Great Replacement is not a "theory." They've admitted it publicly, in books, at conferences, & in classrooms. That's like saying China's Belt & Road Initiative is just a "theory." Stupid.
Daily Mail readers were never this based before.
If you like that, you'll like this other video by the same creator - "You will be happy":
I think it's already per capita, as it says "rate" relative to Danish natives.