1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would be nice to be via percentage of population as well.

I think it's already per capita, as it says "rate" relative to Danish natives.

4
RPD2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Video source?

6
RPD2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Interesting to see the Pfizer director of research and development being caught saying: "Like, I had to get the vaccine otherwise I would have gotten fired, right?"

8
RPD2 8 points ago +8 / -0

To clarify the title, when I said "Elon tweets concerning", I didn't mean his tweets were considered concerning, but instead meant he literally tweeted the word "concerning" about the FBI's comments/actions.

In other words, Elon is being based.

4
RPD2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Looks kinda like the Babylon Bee, but more subtle and spicy :)

6
RPD2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Garbage? I thought it was hilarious. What's wrong with it in your opinion?

3
RPD2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unlike Alex Jones, Elon didn't say no, but he was banned under Elon's watch.

4
RPD2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wikipedia's list loses out on a few things. You can't easily sort all of them by most users (you can for specific years, but not as a whole). The data has too much whitespace between each entry, and there's no clear colour coding for unbanned users. That's what I hoped to rectify here!

4
RPD2 4 points ago +5 / -1

Feel sad about that. IIRC, he was a mod on the old T_D back on Reddit who was also a politician or something? He was super based, even for T_D which was a bit cucked back at that point.

2
RPD2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think a gradual approach is better as otherwise, it may backfire if tons of big companies leave (such as Apple already I think).

4
RPD2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh I'll add ConceptualJames to the next iteration, thanks!

Looks like they're all rolling off the board now.

10
RPD2 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm more concerned about Alex Jones not being reinstated.

9
RPD2 9 points ago +10 / -1

Because she said that male victims of rape are not real victims.

She's an idiot then. Thing is, I'm not sure if it's warranted she should go in the table anyway, because she only had 60.6K subscribers. I'm in two minds whether to keep the "Picks from the rest" data in the final percentage result.

7
RPD2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Largely meaningless, who cares for prominent people?

I partially agree, but unless I stick to a set amount, it's easy to bias the percentage as progress, when it may not be. By sticking with this lot, it's harder to cherry pick and thus bias the data.

14
RPD2 14 points ago +14 / -0

Why shouldn't she be brought back?

I'm a bit of a free speech totalitarian (at least within US law), so I think it's good that they're all back.

23
RPD2 23 points ago +23 / -0

I can update this table periodically as Elon starts to unban more and more people. 16.4% restoration so far. Obviously this ignores the countless unknowns that have been banned. Generally, only the famous people are in this one (sourced from Wiki's list here).

Greens are good! That means Elon is keeping to his promises. Pale red are neutral - Elon has yet to unban these.

But deep red is bad. This means Elon is being hypocritical. We want as few of these as possible.

9
RPD2 9 points ago +9 / -0

One of the comments, upvoted to 131 (13 downvotes):

Great Replacement is not a "theory." They've admitted it publicly, in books, at conferences, & in classrooms. That's like saying China's Belt & Road Initiative is just a "theory." Stupid.

Daily Mail readers were never this based before.

-1
RPD2 -1 points ago +1 / -2

What's so bad about seed oils?

Oh and Beyond Meat burgers (especially McDonalds) are amazing tasting and way less dystopian than abattoirs.

by folx
2
RPD2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha how did I manage that.

view more: Next ›