But you are aware that Israel is a Jewish ethnostate that prioritizes Jewish interests above non-Jewish interests.

https://files.catbox.moe/y9vdj5.jpg

https://files.catbox.moe/xwc01y.jpg

So do you also support the right for White countries to exist? For White people to exist? Why do you prioritize one country over other countries? That's discrimination. That's nationalism. That's identity politics.

It's not about the number. It's about your bloodline. Your genes. Your ancestor's heritage. It's about the long-term survival of your people, and your culture.

Any society with <2.1 birth rate is guaranteed to go extinct, forever. There are no "do-overs" in evolution, once your genes are gone, you're gone. That's why it matters.

Every person should be striving to have as many babies as possible, to have their genes thrive and prosper. Anybody who refuses will simply be culled from the gene pool and replaced by people who aren't retarded.

Bingo. The birthrate of secular Jews is about the same as Western countries. But Israel has a high percentage of ultra-Orthodox Jews who do have a high birth rate.

Hey Jester, I have a question for you. If you hate identity politics so much, why do you have the flag of Israel on your wall?

https://files.catbox.moe/rfu4gx.jpg

Billy was coerced into silence, the glowies got to him. Secret gag orders are a real bitch.

The conflict between Palestinians and Jews is well documented:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_casualties_of_war

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_political_violence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_settler_violence

There have been ~100,000 Palestinians murdered directly in war:

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/total-casualties-arab-israeli-conflict

But many others murdered in other ways:

https://prepareforchange.net/2019/06/20/palestinian-genocide-5100000-palestinians-have-been-killed-since-1948/

And even ignoring the direct murders, it is a fact that Israel used to be 90% Arab, but is now only 20% Arab, and the few remaining Arabs are second-class citizens who are not allowed to vote.

No matter how you look at it, Jews invaded and stole Palestine away from the native Palestinians, Israel is one of the greatest human rights tragedies in modern times.

KiA2 has never been about gaming, it started with GamerGate (which was about nepotism and corruption in journalism, not gaming).

Also, 99% of the topics on the front page are political, which isn't surprising since KiA2 has always been political. There is nothing on the site that indicates that it is non-political gaming only.

Also, even if you believe that KiA2 should be about gaming only, I was merely replying to a political comment that somebody else made, so you should be directing your criticism at them, not me.

Yes indeed, I am a horrible monster, I posted an image. I guess I'll be arrested now.

I'm claiming that women's nature is being exploited to make them feel afraid and oppressed 100% of the time, which is why there is such exaggerated in-group preference. Again, back to the survival mechanism.

In that case I agree.

Granted, these are communities where gender roles are very traditional and women are expected to be subservient to their husbands. It's up to you whether you see this as the "default" state of female nature or whether you believe the more modern paranoid female nature is the "default".

That's the crux of the issue, isn't it? I'm firmly in the "women require the patriarchy in order to behave properly" camp.

Not necessarily because they're women... but because all people need the patriarchy in order to behave properly.

Structure, authority, hierarchy, self-control, discipline, these are necessary qualities in society. When you lose that, you get narcissistic hedonistic women, and weak soyboy hedonistic men.

But I believe that women have less innate self-control than men, so they're hit even harder by the lack of patriarchy.

So you're scared of having your IP leaked.

And you don't use a VPN.

And you don't realize that your IP is leaked on literally every website you ever visited (including .win).

Why not both? Go ahead and vote, but also prepare for an inevitable non-voting solution.

Exactly, it's all about boiling the frog. The elite realized that social change is happening too quickly, so they're trying to slow it down. But we need to accelerate, accelerate so fast that even the normies can't ignore it anymore.

Not just Islam, the entire world outside of Western countries is patriarchial. And even just 100 years ago all Western countries were patriarchial too. It's been that way for hundreds of thousands of years... for good reason.

Well the Rothchilds have been in charge for hundreds of years, but okay, sure.

https://files.catbox.moe/47lzaz.png

He's not wrong, though. If you want to know who runs things, look at the old money, the wealthy international bankers like the Rothchilds, Goldman Sachs, Bloomberg, etc.

Everyone has a bias in favor of women, including and maybe even especially men, so I think you'd have a hard time arguing the point that women shouldn't be judges on that point alone.

Yes, that is true, and it's a big problem (women receiving much lighter sentences for the same crime), however the bias is 4.5 times higher for women than men.

Even today women are very hostile (i.e. passive aggressive) towards one another except in situations where men are perceived as a threat and then they band together (which makes sense biologically given their physical disadvantage).

Yes, exactly right. For example, when a woman falsely accuses a man of rape, women will always rush to take her side, regardless of the evidence. "Innocent before proven guilty" gets thrown right out the window.

I'd like to see a source for that, because I'm not convinced. We can do studies today on female behavior, but no such studies exist from hundreds or thousands of years ago, and I don't see any evidence in the history books of this type of behavior being the norm.

I don't have any direct evidence (as you can imagine, it's hard to find), however it was very common in cultures all around the world to take measures to prevent female bias (e.g. in Islam a woman's testimony only counts as half the same as a man's), and obviously women weren't allowed to be in any positions of power (and for good reason, they found out the hard way what happens when women are given power).

From what I can tell, from reading Greek and Roman sources, it seems that women's behavior 2,000 years ago was identical to women's behavior today. That makes sense, since men's behavior is also identical, because most human behavior is genetic, and 2,000 years isn't enough time to have significant evolution.

Of course I'm not a socialist, only a complete moron would think that socialism is a good idea.

So in addition to falsely accusing me of being a socialist, you're now claiming that I'm a Nazi too? You claim that you love individualism, but you sure do love rushing to defend your fellow Jews whenever they are rightfully criticized.

You don't care about them. Because you are using the scottish, syrians, egyptians, english, saudi arabians, jordanians and others as pawns on your retarded socialist hate against Jews

Why are you trying so hard to defend Israeli colonialism and human rights abuses? Why are you trying so hard to deny the millions of innocent people who were murdered and driven out of their home? Why do you think that their ethnicity matters? All non-Jews were abused in Israel, regardless of their ethnicity, it wasn't only Arabs who were abused.

Am I not allowed to point out injustices which happen in the world? Or am I only allowed to point out non-Jewish injustices, and as soon as a Jew does an injustice I'm not allowed to point it out? That doesn't sound very individualistic.

If you are so concerned about socialism, shouldn't you be criticizing the Jews in academia who are promoting socialism? Shouldn't you be criticizing the kibbutz in Israel?

And if you are so concerned about individualism, shouldn't you be criticizing the Jews who believe in Jewish supremacy? Shouldn't you be criticizing the extremely strong Jewish communal group identity? Shouldn't you be criticizing the Zionist Jews?

Socialist? But Karl Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, and most of the Soviet leadership were Jews. And communist kibbutz are extremely common in Israel. Do you think I am a Jew?

Do you think that everybody who criticizes Israel is a socialist? Do you think that everybody who cares about the human rights of Palestinians is a socialist?

Context matters. It was clear that I was referring to the Zionist Jews who were intentionally trying to take over Palestine. I obviously wasn't referring to the American Jews, or the Polish Jews, or the Russian Jews.

Now you're just trying to nitpick because you don't actually have a point, but you don't want to admit that I didn't break any rules.

But that's not male in-group bias, and so it won't affect men's judgements in court.

But the female in-group bias does affect it, because it applies to all females, regardless of their shared experiences or connections.

Women will blindly take the side of other random women that they don't even know. Men never do that.

It's just a theory, but one reason women may exhibit more in-group bias based on gender is because society is constantly telling them that women (as a group) are oppressed and that men (as a group) are the enemy.

That can't be true, because women have had in-group bias for many thousands of years, and this idea that "women are oppressed and men are the enemy" happened very recently, not long enough for evolution to occur.